Lex Loci Delictus and Global Economic Welfare: Spinozzi V. ITT Sheraton Corp

By Goldsmith, Jack L.; Sykes, Alan O. | Harvard Law Review, March 2007 | Go to article overview

Lex Loci Delictus and Global Economic Welfare: Spinozzi V. ITT Sheraton Corp


Goldsmith, Jack L., Sykes, Alan O., Harvard Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

The traditional choice-of-law rule for tort was lex loci delictus--the law of the place where the plaintiff suffered the wrong. (1) Beginning with the legal realists in the 1920s, scholars (and later, courts) criticized the lex loci rule as formalistic, manipulable, unfair, and in some instances incoherent. (2) Judicial adherence to the lex loci rule has been diminishing for decades. Today only ten states embrace it. (3)

The lex loci rule has largely been replaced by interest analysis, its cousin the Second Restatement, and related approaches. (4) These modern choice-of-law methodologies are famously indeterminate and do not permit systematic generalizations about which substantive tort law governs in particular cases. But compared to the lex loci rule, the modern rules have one unmistakable consequence: they make it more likely that the forum court will apply local tort law to wrongs that occurred in another jurisdiction. For this reason, modern choice-of-law approaches give plaintiffs an incentive to sue in a forum that has more generous tort laws than the place of injury. This incentive is most powerful when plaintiffs are injured outside the United States by defendants amenable to suit within the United States. The substantive tort law and related procedural mechanisms available in U.S. courts are generally much more favorable to plaintiffs, and produce much larger recoveries, than the law and procedures available in foreign courts.

In Spinozzi v. ITT Sheraton Corp., (5) Judge Posner, in typical contrarian fashion, presented a full-throated defense of the traditional lex loci rule in the context of a transnational tort. The plaintiff in Spinozzi, a dentist from Illinois, suffered serious injuries when he fell into a maintenance pit at a Sheraton hotel while on vacation in Acapulco, Mexico. (6) The district court, sitting in diversity and applying Illinois choice-of-law rules, (7) held that Mexican law governed the case and precluded the plaintiff's recovery because Mexican law "makes contributory negligence a complete defense to negligence liability and the uncontested facts showed that Dr. Spinozzi had been contributorily negligent." (8)

A unanimous Seventh Circuit panel, in an opinion by Judge Posner, affirmed. Judge Posner purported to apply the Second Restatement's "most significant relationship" test, which prevails in Illinois. (9) But he ignored the details of that test. Instead, he implicitly drew on an analysis that he had earlier sketched in his treatise. (10) He reasoned:

  [The jurisdiction in which the accident occurs] is the place that has
  the greatest interest in striking a reasonable balance among safety,
  cost, and other factors pertinent to the design and administration of
  a system of tort law. Most people affected whether as victims or as
  injurers by accidents and other injury-causing events are residents
  of the jurisdiction in which the event takes place. So if law can be
  assumed to be generally responsive to the values and preferences of
  the people who live in the community that formulated the law, the law
  of the place of the accident can be expected to reflect the values and
  preferences of the people most likely to be involved in accidents--can
  be expected, in other words, to be responsive and responsible law,
  law that internalizes the costs and benefits of the people affected by
  it.

  ... Illinois residents may want a higher standard of care than the
  average hotel guest in Mexico, but to supplant Mexican by Illinois
  tort law would disserve the general welfare because it would mean that
  Mexican safety standards (insofar as they are influenced by tort
  suits) were being set by people having little stake in those
  standards. (11)

Judge Posner argued, in other words, that because each jurisdiction has a comparative regulatory advantage with respect to events within its territory, the lex loci rule is efficient. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lex Loci Delictus and Global Economic Welfare: Spinozzi V. ITT Sheraton Corp
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.