Preservationism, or the Elephant in the Room: How Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage Deceive Us into Establishing Religion

By Wilson, Justin T. | Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, January 2007 | Go to article overview

Preservationism, or the Elephant in the Room: How Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage Deceive Us into Establishing Religion


Wilson, Justin T., Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy


"People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution. They don't put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."

--Jamin Raskin, Professor of Law, American University, in testimony before the Maryland Senate Judicial Proceedings Committed (1)

INTRODUCTION

I. DEFINING "MARRIAGE".
     A. A Brief History and Overview
     B. The Establishment Clause and Our Religious Heritage
II. A PRIMER ON THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND ITS KIN
     A. What Are Same-Sex Marriage Bans and What Do They Do?
     B. Who Supports the FMA?
III. WHERE ARE WE GOING, AND WHY ARE WE IN THIS HANDBASKET?: A
     SHIFT IN FUNDAMENTAL(IST) RHETORIC
     A. The Theoretical Underpinnings of Preservationism
     B. Preservationism: An Application
IV. MODERN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE: "HOPELESS
    DISARRAY".
     A. The Lemon-Endorsement Test: Context-Specificity and the
        Requirement of Government Neutrality Toward and Among
        Religions
        1. The Lemon Test
        2. The Endorsement Test
    B. The Historical-Acknowledgement Test: A Free Pass to
        Christian Majorities
        1. "Unbroken History": Chief Justice Rehnquist's Test
        2. The Framers and Original Meaning: Justice Scalia's Test
V. DO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BANS PASS MUSTER?: APPLYING THE
   LEMON-ENDORSEMENT TEST
    A. The Search for a Secular Purpose: Evaluating the Arguments
        Against Same-Sex Civil Marriage
        1. The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), Social
           Science, and a Bit of History
        2. Why We Have Opposite-Sex Marriage: Circularity,
           Question-Begging, and a Pound of Logic
        3. Of Slippery Slopes and Social Destruction:
           Consequentialism, Perversity, and Chicken Little
        4. A New Slippery Slope: Religious Freedom and Sincerely-Held
           Beliefs
        5. Warhorses: Public Health and Morals
        6. Federalism, the Conflict of Laws, and Institutional
           Legitimacy
    B. Applying the Lemon-Endorsement Test
        1. What Does the Reasonable Observer Know About the
           Context and History of Same-Sex Marriage Bans and the
           FMA?
        2. Does the FMA Have the Purpose of Endorsing or
           Establishing Religion ?
        3. Does the FMA Have the Effect of Endorsing or Establishing
           Religion?
        4. Does the FMA Segment Society into Political Insiders and
           Outsiders Based Upon Their Religious Beliefs?
VI. CONCLUSION: RESOLVING OUR DEFINITIONAL PROBLEM

INTRODUCTION

America is suffering from a definitional crisis regarding the term "marriage." This crisis has crystallized in the context of the debate over same-sex marriage. (2) Because Americans cannot agree on what marriage is or should be, we cannot agree on whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. Moreover, Americans have historically--and in recent years, sometimes deliberately--conflated notions of civil marriage and religious marriage. (3) This has resulted in the imposition of a religious definition of marriage on the larger society. As a consequence, the definitional crisis is not mere disagreement about the humanity of same-sex couples--rather, the crisis also carries constitutional implications because of the tangled histories of religious and civil marriage. Nevertheless, the status quo (opposite-sex marriage only) remains largely undisturbed: In all but one of the fifty states, (4) marriage is presently defined--either explicitly or implicitly--as the legal union of one man and one woman. (5)

Most of the present-day definitional tension arises because American governments have historically intertwined the civil and religious roots of marriage. According to the Pew Research Center, the two most common demographic indicators for opposition to same-sex civil marriage are age (6) and religiosity. (7) Indeed, young adults and "seculars" actually favor same-sex civil marriage by substantial margins. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Preservationism, or the Elephant in the Room: How Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage Deceive Us into Establishing Religion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.