Free Trade Meets U.S. Farm Policy: Life after the Uruguay Round

By Heggy, Liane L. | Law and Policy in International Business, Summer 1994 | Go to article overview

Free Trade Meets U.S. Farm Policy: Life after the Uruguay Round


Heggy, Liane L., Law and Policy in International Business


I. Introduction

The significance of global agricultural production and trade became clear during the Uruguay Round of talks on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT),(1) as GATT members struggled to negotiate an agreement on the reduction of tariff and nontariff barriers to trade in agriculture. At the same time in the United States, especially during the early 1990s, the Bush Administration vigorously pursued free trade agreements as part of its policy of eliminating all trade barriers throughout the entire Western Hemisphere.(2) This commitment was evidenced in the Administration's support of the U.S. Canada Free Trade Agreement (CFTA),(3) the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA),(4) the Uruguay Round,(5) and numerous bilateral agreements.

A number of developing countries in Latin America also adopted the goal of large-scale free trade through agreements with the United States, agreements among themselves and through active participation in the GATT talks.(6) Because many of these countries are heavily dependent upon agricultural products for export earnings, agricultural trade plays a critical role in their efforts to build free trade regimes.

As an industrial power, the United States has been a major player in the production and international trade of agricultural commodities since the early 1970s. Accordingly, the United States is able to exert great influence over the international market for agricultural goods not only through its trade policy, but also through its domestic agriculture policy.(7) Further, U.S. domestic agricultural policy functions as a constraint on other agriculture-exporting nations, especially those In the developing world, where trade tends to be agriculture-dependent.(8) Generally, U.S. farm policy, offers products farmers supplemental income through a variety of mechanism to compensate for domestic and international market forces that would not otherwise provide sufficient income to justify continued production. Because U.S. exports dominate the world market for certain agricultural products, U.S. farm policy has the potential to shape internal policy and markets in developing countries, as well as export options and earning power for their agricultural sectors.(10)

This Note examines the dilemma inherent in U.S. agricultural policy. On one hand, the United States is firmly committed to its farm support programs, which are designed specification to improve the competitiveness of domestic agricultural commodities in the world market through policies that pay U.S. farmers more for their products than the world market price. On the other hand, the United States apparently is equally dedicated to the pursuit of free trade, a regime in which producers compete in the world marketplace without any economic intervention other than each country's "natural" competitive advantages. The conflict between these policies becomes particularly evident when free trade negotiations Include agriculture-dependent nations, whose governments generally have no money to subsidize farm production, but whose products nevertheless must compete with subsidized products from the United States in the world market. How can the United States pursue free trade, specifically free trade with heavily agriculture-dependent nations, while continuing to fund huge subsidy programs for domestic farmers

This Note first examines the United States' power as an agriculture exporter and specific domestic programs employed to support farm incomes and exports. Though only sixteen commodities are covered by the programs, the list includes the most important agricultural export commodities in world trade. Not only do agriculture-dependent nations have a disadvantage in selling their agricultural products to the United States because of their level of economic development, they also must face U.S. subsidized products head-on in competition for export sales to the rest of the world. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Free Trade Meets U.S. Farm Policy: Life after the Uruguay Round
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.