Reconstructing Section 5: A Post-Katrina Proposal for Voting Rights Act Reform

By Williams, Damian | The Yale Law Journal, March 2007 | Go to article overview

Reconstructing Section 5: A Post-Katrina Proposal for Voting Rights Act Reform


Williams, Damian, The Yale Law Journal


NOTE CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

  I. AN "UNCOMMON" ENFORCEMENT TOOL
     A. Two Generations of Section 5
     B. The Beer Retrogression Standard

 II. THE POST-KATRINA PRECLEARANCE PROCESS
     A. The Emergency Voting Plan
     B. The Preclearance Paradox

III. RETROGRESSION RECONSIDERED

     A. Dynamic Benchmarking
        1. Assessing the Existing Voting Regime
        2. Selecting a Replacement Benchmark
        3. Exiting Dynamic Benchmarking: One Front Door, One Back Door
     B. Support for Dynamic Benchmarking
        1. Legislative History
        2. Previous Departures from Static Benchmarking
     C. Applying Dynamic Benchmarking to Post-Katrina Louisiana

CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana and the Gulf Coast began the long march to recovery. Hurricane Katrina was the most destructive natural disaster in American history, (1) resulting in approximately 1500 deaths in Louisiana alone (2) and sparking a human displacement unrivaled since the Dust Bowl migration of the 1930s. (3) Although the Category 3 storm inflicted significant damage along the entire Gulf Coast, its wrath was felt most acutely in the city of New Orleans, where massive flooding overwhelmed poorly constructed levees and drowned vast stretches of the city. (4)

Katrina's primary victims were New Orleans's most vulnerable citizens--those who could not afford to evacuate or who had homes in low-lying areas hit hardest by the flooding? Renters (6) and African-American residents (7) were particularly harmed; African-Americans constituted the majority of the displaced and, in the post-disaster period, tended to live farther away from New Orleans than white evacuees. (8) Although many sought refuge in nearby cities like Baton Rouge, Katrina's "diaspora" (9) scattered most residents to cities outside of Louisiana, such as Houston and Atlanta. (10)

Against this backdrop of devastation, Louisiana's political leaders were charged with the unprecedented task of conducting elections with a displaced electorate. For generations, the state's political system existed in an uneasy partisan and racial balance, with black voters often determining the outcomes of state and federal elections. (11) New Orleans, with a population that was 67% African-American, (12) was the center of minority political power in Louisiana. But Katrina struck a deep blow to the city's minority electorate: between 27% and 48% of Orleans Parish voters were displaced, and of these voters, 75% were black. (13) With New Orleans's first post-Katrina municipal elections scheduled to take place in February 2006, and with rising speculation of an impending racial and political realignment, (14) the Louisiana State Legislature began the highly contested process of developing new voting rules for a devastated democracy.

Because of its deep history of racially discriminatory politics, (15) Louisiana must--in developing voting rules--comply with section 5, the most celebrated and controversial provision of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965. (16) Section 5 requires Louisiana and other "covered jurisdictions" (17) to preclear all changes in their voting laws with either the Department of Justice (DOJ) or a special three-judge district court in Washington, D.C., before the changes take effect. (18) The provision was originally crafted in response to the persistent and creative tactics employed by covered jurisdictions to avoid federal civil rights mandates. (19) By demanding preclearance for all voting changes--from the seemingly insignificant and uncontested, to the most critical and controversial--section 5 enlists the federal government as a constant chaperone in matters of state election administration.

The test used to enforce section 5, which I will call the "static benchmarking" test, (20) was conceived by the Supreme Court in Beer v. United States to ward off voting changes that would result in a "retrogression" in minority voters' "effective exercise of the electoral franchise. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Upgrade your membership to receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad‑free environment

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Reconstructing Section 5: A Post-Katrina Proposal for Voting Rights Act Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved in your active project from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.