Making Sense of 'God Hates Fags' and 'Thank God for 9/11': A Thematic Analysis of Milbloggers' Responses to Reverend Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church

By Brouwer, Daniel C.; Hess, Aaron | Western Journal of Communication, January 2007 | Go to article overview

Making Sense of 'God Hates Fags' and 'Thank God for 9/11': A Thematic Analysis of Milbloggers' Responses to Reverend Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church


Brouwer, Daniel C., Hess, Aaron, Western Journal of Communication


As the death toll of U.S. troops deployed in the Bush Administration's War on Terror continues to grow, more and more families and communities confront the painful and arduous task of ritualizing the deaths of loved ones. For some of these families and communities, this task has been complicated by the highly visible and antagonistic presence of the Reverend Fred Phelps and other members of the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC). Famous for protests at the funerals of queer people and people who have died from AIDS-related causes, the WBC has recently gained attention for protesting at the funerals of military personnel killed in Iraq. Beginning in June 2005 at military funerals in Massachusetts, Idaho, Nebraska, Wisconsin, and elsewhere across the United States, the families and communities of Army Staff Sergeant Christopher Piper, National Guard Corporal Carrie French, National Guard Medic Tricia Jameson, Marine Lance Corporal John Mattek, Jr., and others have endured the WBC's vexing theodicy that links national security to heterosexuality. None of the deceased soldiers are known to identify as queer. Yet through the utterance and display of slogans that proclaim "God Hates Fags," "USA = Fag Nation," "Thank God for 9/11," and more, the Phelps protesters argue that the nation's deceased military personnel serve as stunning, corporeal evidence that God is punishing this nation for its tolerance of homosexuality and other vices. This articulation is not novel, [1] but its expression at the funerals of U.S. military personnel is controversial and intriguing. Months before state and federal legislatures began proposing and passing legislation restricting protest activities at military and civilian funerals in direct response to WBC protests, current and former members of the military, families and friends of the deceased, and other parties interested in the U.S. military responded to the protests with a mixture of astonishment, skepticism, and anger. Analysis of these responses has much to tell us about the constitution of nation, nationality, citizenship, religion, and sexuality in these post-9/11 times.

We began with a simple question: how do people in the U.S. military and supporters of the military make sense of the WBC's presence at military funerals? To answer this question, we conducted an analysis of vernacular responses to Phelps' military funeral protests. By "vernacular," we mean discourse that is non-institutional, informal, quotidian, or mundane but still constitutive of public opinion (Hauser, 1999, p. 11). [2] For sources of vernacular discourse, we explored fifty weblogs. More specifically, we explored milblogs, blogs that host discussions on war and military issues and are maintained by active-duty, inactive-duty, or veteran members of the military, their spouses or family members, or supportive civilians. [3] In our view, milblogs provided access to communities of invested commentators who were likely to be familiar with the Phelps protests and whose vernacular commentary evidenced individual and collective efforts to shape political horizons and political communities (p. 92). [4]

Articulation theory informs our analysis. Following and extending the work of leading theorists of articulation such as Stuart Hall (1980) and Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe (1985), contemporary scholars conceive of articulation as "both a way of understanding how ideological elements come, under certain conditions, to cohere together within a discourse, and a way of asking how they do or do not become articulated, at specific conjunctures, to certain political subjects" (Grossberg, 1996, pp. 141-142). That is, articulation theory motivates scholars to examine, amidst conditions of social complexity, how ideologies and ideological elements are invoked, mobilized, combined, altered, rejected, or ignored. Key outcomes of such analyses include specification of "the role of discourse in the constitution of the social world" (DeLuca, 1999, p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Making Sense of 'God Hates Fags' and 'Thank God for 9/11': A Thematic Analysis of Milbloggers' Responses to Reverend Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.