Supreme Court's Double Standard: Gerrymander Hypocrisy

By Raskin, Jamin B. | The Nation, February 6, 1995 | Go to article overview

Supreme Court's Double Standard: Gerrymander Hypocrisy


Raskin, Jamin B., The Nation


Racial double standards are nothing new in American law, but the Supreme Court's voting rights jurisprudence has turned farcical. State legislators redrawing Congressional and state legislative districts in the 1990s now carry both a license and a warning from the Court. The license, granted for decades, is to draw far-flung squiggly lines all over the map in order to guarantee the legislators' re-election or the re-election of incumbent white U.S. House members. The warning, issued in the Court's 1993 Shaw v. Reno decision, is not to draw any such "bizarre" districts with the purpose of creating African-American or Latino political majorities.

These two Supreme Court positions are on a logical collision course. From the day it was decided, Shaw looked deeply suspicious, since it imposed strict scrutiny on only those oddly shaped districts where African-Americans or Latinos are in a majority. The Court had never before found that the Constitution required districts to have certain shapes, sizes or looks. District appearance was a question for the states. Now, in the name of tidy district lines and fighting what Justice Sandra Day O'Connor called "political apartheid" (a term never used by the Court to describe slavery, Jim Crow, poll taxes, literacy tests or white primaries), the Court cast doubt on dozens of racially integrated districts represented by blacks and Latinos.

In the wake of Shaw, the Court's disparate treatment of white incumbents and black and Latino majorities has only grown more glaring. Several federal courts have struck down oddly shaped districts with black and Latino majorities and representatives, while upholding oddly shaped districts next door where white majorities have elected white politicians to office. In the illustrative case of Vera v. Richards last August, a panel of three Republican judges threw out as racial gerrymanders two majority-black Congressional districts and one majority-Latino district in Texas, solemnly invoking Martin Luther King Jr. along the way.

Meanwhile, the same panel categorically rejected challenges to majority-white districts whose perimeters looked every bit as peculiar as those of the minority districts. The panel was not disturbed that House incumbents from Texas "were actively involved in the redistricting process" or that they were so influential in getting districts drawn for "incumbency protection" that all but one of them had been re-elected in 1992. Neither were the judges troubled by the fact that the minority districts appeared contorted precisely because white Democratic incumbents, looking for liberal votes, took big geographic bites out of minority communities.

By blessing the entrenchment of white incumbents and wiping out black and Latino majority districts, the Texas court is only following the perverse logic of Supreme Court doctrine. The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, enacted in 1868 to dismantle white supremacy, has been twisted by the Court to mean that African-Americans and other minorities may not form a numerical majority in any district unless they are in communities that are geographically compact and residentially isolated. Political apartheid, indeed.

As a matter of democratic theory, the couple of dozen districts drawn to facilitate black and Latino majorities are far more defensible than the hundreds of districts drawn to protect particular white incumbents. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Supreme Court's Double Standard: Gerrymander Hypocrisy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.