The Enlightenment, the Foundation of Modern Europe

By Bousquet, Francois | International Review of Mission, July-October 2006 | Go to article overview

The Enlightenment, the Foundation of Modern Europe


Bousquet, Francois, International Review of Mission


Although I am a philosopher and a theologian, and not an historian, I agreed to give this opening presentation for the simple reason that theology is not done in the heavens. Theology is done within the social and historical context of religious traditions. In like manner, philosophy is not, as many people imagine, reflection on things written in books but consists rather in contemplation of things as they are in reality. This is why it is important that things be examined in their historical context. Otherwise, they could be explained but not understood. I will, of course, be presenting a particular hermeneutic. Fortunately, the various interpretations that are being given will immediately be followed by alternative viewpoints and a debate. True science takes place in dialogue.

I begin my talk with an invitation to respect the complexity of this subject. This is because three centuries after the Enlightenment (understood in an ideologically simplified way since les lumieres in France do not correspond exactly to the Aufklarung in Germany) this movement has served as a rallying point for some people and been a repulsive obstacle to others. It has been a rallying point for knowledge against naivete and ignorance, for democracy against tyranny, and for humanism against religion. However, in each of these cases adjustments and corrections have had to be made. The scientism and positivism of the end of the 19th century are far removed from the enthusiasm of the Encyclopedie. Democracy has yet to progress beyond the simple demand of the upwardly mobile social classes to participate in the exercise of power. Finally, the men of the Enlightenment were not primarily atheistic. They fought the domination of the church and the cleric over the public sphere, the res publica. The State did not wish to be "godless"; it objected to the omnipresence of the church. The Enlightenment was an obstacle in that the reactions of the 19th century, from Burke to de Maistre, criticized, not without contradiction, the principles of tolerance and the Rights of Man as the source of the excesses and violence of the Revolution. This paradox continues into the 20th century with the objections of the conservatives or nationalists, and of those individuals who wonder why a civilization like that of the Enlightenment was unable to protect the Jewish people from the genocide of the Shoah. (2) All of this should be a warning to us, if warning is needed, that things are not as simple as they might seem to be.

We must start by coming to an agreement on dates. I am adopting those used by Pierre Chaunu, viz. 1680-1780, which he considers to be "round dates" for the Enlightenment. (3) As Chaunu points out, one must not forget that the Enlightenment follows the changes that took place during the years 1620-1650. These were in his opinion, "Thirty organizing years, 1620-1650, during which time several hundred middle class people, gentlemen, and officers who were directly affected by the mercantile system, were set free from the worries of earning their livelihood by the State and through the labors of others. It was precisely the European miracle of mechanization that took place during the second quarter of the 17th century that is the key to understanding this period of time. It was this physical reality that allowed European civilization to organize its thoughts. This is the concrete temporal foundation upon which Enlightenment thinking and the scientific civilization of the 20th century indirectly, yet assuredly, rest." (4) Paul Hazard also points to a "crisis of the European conscience" during the years 1680-1715, that he considers to be a sort of terror provoked by the changes mentioned by Chaunu, and which would allow a doubling of the population between the years 1730-1770. An even more brutal series of revolutionary transformations would take place following 1780.

In any case, it is not inappropriate to speak of the Enlightenment as one of the roots of Europe. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Enlightenment, the Foundation of Modern Europe
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.