Predicting Juvenile Offender Recidivism: Risk-Need Assessment and Juvenile Justice Officers

By Upperton, Rachel A.; Thompson, Anthony P. | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, April 2007 | Go to article overview

Predicting Juvenile Offender Recidivism: Risk-Need Assessment and Juvenile Justice Officers


Upperton, Rachel A., Thompson, Anthony P., Psychiatry, Psychology and Law


This study compared the validity of structured versus unstructured risk predictions. Fourteen Juvenile Justice Officers (JJOT) provided 121 risk need inventory assessments for offending youth under community supervision. Using a rating scale (0-10), another group of 20 J JOT provided estimates of reoffending for a different sample of 107 young offenders. Follow-up data from a few months to approximately 2 years were accessed to identify new convictions. Predictive validity analyses yielded marginally higher, but non-significant, differences in favour of the inventory (area under ROC curve = .75 versus .70). Detection indices improved slightly when reoffending status was determined for a subset of male offenders at 15 months post-assessment. It was noteworthy that when risk scores were converted to categorical ranges (low, medium, high), the distribution was significantly different for the inventory compared with the officers. This was due to more high-risk ratings by JJOs compared with more low-risk rating from the inventory and highlights one advantage of the latter approach.

Predicting Juvenile Offender Recidivism: Risk--Need Assessment and Juvenile Justice Officers

Assessing the risks and needs of young offenders has become standard practice in many juvenile justice jurisdictions. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention in the United States adopted prevention and intervention as the basis for its comprehensive juvenile crime strategy (Coolbaugh & Hansel, 2002; Howell, 1995). A central feature of that strategy involves assessing risk factors and treatment needs which is an approach echoed by many others (Hoge & Andrews, 1996; Day, Howells, & Rickwood, 2004; McLaren, 2000). This widespread juvenile justice strategy reflects some of the same principles (risk, need, responsivity) that have been promoted for 20 years in adult corrections (Andrews, 1991; Andrews & Bonta, 1994) and can be traced to much earlier criminological views (Glueck & Glueck, 1974; Warner, 1923). Assessment inventories for juvenile offenders have been developed to support the risk--need framework in jurisdictions in Canada (Hoge & Andrews, 2003), the United States (Gavazzi et al., 2003; Howell, 1995; Schwalbe, Fraser, Day, & Arnold, 2004), England and Wales (Baker, Jones, Roberts, & Merrington, 2003) and Australia (Thompson & Putnins, 2003).

There are numerous advantages to the systematic assessment of risk and needs using inventories such as those listed above (Hoge, 2002; Thompson & Putnins, 2003). One of the presumed advantages is that future offending is more accurately identified by such inventories and the consequent empirical database than by the idiosyncratic prognostications of juvenile justice staff or clinical experts, for that matter. This argument draws its support from a large body of literature showing that actuarial aggregation of pertinent information matches or betters intuitive judgment when it comes to predicting future behaviours (Bonta, Law, & Hanson, 1998; Dawes, Faust, & Meehl, 1989; Westen & Weinberger, 2004). In spite of the weight of this evidence, predictive validity for any instrument cannot be assumed. Risk-need inventories tend to be developed and adapted in various ways in various jurisdictions and used by staff with differing degrees of training and quality control support (Flores, Travis, & Latessa, 2003).

Studies show that scores produced by risk-need inventories are associated with recidivism for both adult (Waiters, 2006) and juvenile offenders (Jung & Rawana, 1999; National Council on Crime and Delinquency, 2000; Risler, Sutphen, & Shields, 2000; Schwalbe et al., 2004). A meta-analysis (Cotde, Lee, & Heilbrun, 2001) of six predictive validity studies (published between 1988 and 1999) dealing with juvenile recidivism found an overall weighted effect size (Fisher's Z) of. 12 (equivalent to a correlation of . …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Predicting Juvenile Offender Recidivism: Risk-Need Assessment and Juvenile Justice Officers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.