The Protection of Environmentally-Displaced Persons in International Law
Lopez, Aurelie, Environmental Law
I. INTRODUCTION II. THE STRIKING EVIDENCE THAT ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE CAUSES LARGE HUMAN MIGRATIONS A. Long-Term Environmental Degradation and Sudden Natural Environmental Disruptions B. Accidents, Including Industrial and Chemical Disasters C. The Aftermath of Armed Conflicts D. Environmentally-Induced Migration Controversy III. THE MAELSTROM STEMMING FROM THE NOTION OF "ENVIRONMENTAL REFUGEE" A. The Blunt, Well-Founded Fear of Persecution of Environmentally-Displaced Persons B. The Blurred Grounds of the Persecution Suffered by Environmentally-Displaced Persons C. The Problematic Dichotomy Among Environmentally-Displaced Persons D. Conclusions Concerning the Environmental Refugee IV. PROPOSITIONS AND ARGUMENTS IN RELATION TO THE PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY-DISPLACED PERSONS A. The Conundrums of Revising the Traditional Refugee Definition to Encompass Environmentally-Displaced Persons B. Proposed Definition of "Environmental Refugee" at the International Level C. The Limits of Applying the Complementary Forms of International Protection to Environmentally-Displaced Persons 1. Complementary Protection in Europe.. The Forgotten Category of Environmentally-Displaced Persons a. Eligibility Criteria for International Protection Under the Directive on Temporary Protection b. Eligibility Criteria for International Protection Under the Directive on Subsidiary Protection c. Conclusion Concerning Complementary Protection in Europe 2. Complementary Protection in the United States: The Uncertain Protection of Environmentally-Displaced Persons D. Proposed International Regime of Complementary Protection Specifically Dealing with Environmentally-Displaced Persons V. CONCLUSION
The United Nations (UN) defines "disaster" as "a serious disruption of the functioning of a society, causing widespread human, material, or environmental losses which exceed the ability of affected society to [cope] using only its own resources." (2) Numerous environmental disasters have indiscriminately touched all continents with devastating effects. (3) Various political, economic, or social factors can cause environmental disasters, which are far-reaching and inextricably linked to growth and development. (4) However, history has repeatedly shown that the environment itself can also be a source of disaster.
Over the past forty years, scientists have approached the issue of environmental degradation from different perspectives and with different rules and procedures. (5) The body of international environmental law sets forth a variety of norms aimed at preventing, reducing, and remedying the multiple aspects of environmental degradation, ad environmental degradation ultimately lead to environmental disasters. In contrast, humanitarian law and human rights law consider environmental degradation from an anthropocentric point of view, addressing the adverse effects of environmental degradation on human beings. While migration to escape an environment temporarily or permanently disrupted is a critical aspect of the issue, the current international legal regime disregards the correlation between environmental degradation and human migration.
The importance of the issue of environmentally-induced migration has been highlighted by scientists, which provoked much debate among legal academics. The seminal event in the development of a comprehensive study on the problems related to environmentally-induced migration was a 1985 United Nations Environment Programme paper on environmental refugees: (6) The expression "environmental refugees," though widely used for the past twenty years, is mistakenly applied. "In everyday speech, the word 'refugee' is used to describe a person who is forced to flee his or her home for any reason for which the individual is not responsible, be it persecution, public disorder, civil war, famine, earthquake or environmental degradation. …