Television Is Only Entertainment, Says New Post-Dispatch Critic

By Bishop, Ed | St. Louis Journalism Review, November 1994 | Go to article overview

Television Is Only Entertainment, Says New Post-Dispatch Critic


Bishop, Ed, St. Louis Journalism Review


When the St. Louis Journalism Review first asked Gail Pennington if she would be available for an interview, she laughed.

"I'm not a deep thinker," she said. "I don't sit around contemplating the navel of television."

In a way, that is what makes her interesting.

Most television critics believe that television is a vast wasteland. Some even see it as a cancer on the American soul. Pennington does not. She sees it as vastly energetic, amusing, informative, fascinating and often satisfying.

Last July, Pennington was named the full-time television critic of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. For a year before that she did the job on a part-time basis while the Post searched for Eric Mink's replacement.

To some people's surprise, Pennington's light touch and amusing prose were well-received. Her stubborn insistence that television was nothing more than entertainment -- and should be judged on its own terms -- seemed to endear her to the Post's readers. She wasn't highbrow; she took television seriously but in a way the average viewer could appreciate. Finally, her editors gave her the job.

Pennington, 45, is a graduate of the University of Missouri's School of Journalism. She worked briefly for the Miami Herald, the Clearwater Sun and the Suburban Journals before joining the Post in 1974 as a copy editor. She rose to the position of assistant features editor and, in 1985, she became the editor of the Sunday television magazine.

Pennington grew up in a small town in southern Arkansas. "We ate fried bologna, all that stuff," she says. In college, she thought of becoming an intellectual. But she wasn't comfortable with foreign movies and deep, meaningful stuff, she says. You get the sense that she decided to go back to her roots, to honor the culture in which she grew up. Today she calls people who look down their noses at television "snobs." But she says it with a smile and the remnants of a soft southern accent.

SJR: What are the differences and the similarities between you and Eric Mink?

PENNINGTON: Eric is one of my best friends -- I miss him every day. I thought he did a fabulous job, but we couldn't be any more different. Eric is a very deep thinker. He likes to do analysis. He likes to do interpretation. I see television as an entertainment medium and I like to write entertainingly about it. I think the thing most people want to know from me is what's good and what's bad.

SJR: What are the similarities?

PENNINGTON: I don't know that there are any similarities. The only similarity that I can think of is that we both watch television. But I love television and I'm not sure Eric loved it to the same degree I do. If I weren't writing about television, I'd still watch a lot of TV. I've always watched a lot of television.

SJR: How difficult was it to replace Mink?

PENNINGTON: Well, you know, I didn't get the job when Eric left. The paper advertised for a media critic and they received a lot of applications. But there was a hiring freeze that worked to my advantage. I said: "Let me try it, let me do it my way, that is, write about television as entertainment." And they said: "Go ahead and start and let's see." At first, I was doing all the watching on my own time, which the Guild wouldn't have approved, but I saw it as a kind of try-out. And, almost immediately, I started getting favorable responses from the public. You know people are a lot more likely to write or call when they dislike something -- all my letters were favorable. I got almost no negative mail or calls. And then my bosses started hearing that people like what I do.

SJR: Why do you think the public response was so positive?

PENNINGTON: I think I connected with them on a level that was interesting to them. They want to know what's good; they want to know what to watch. There are a lot of channels out there. It's difficult for them to sort it out and they appreciated that I told them briefly what was good and what was bad. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Television Is Only Entertainment, Says New Post-Dispatch Critic
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.