Enforcing Arbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees

By Knight, Jeffery R. | Defense Counsel Journal, April 1994 | Go to article overview

Enforcing Arbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees


Knight, Jeffery R., Defense Counsel Journal


The Supreme Court and lower federal courts are moving toward enforcement of employer-employee arbitration clauses, but some doubts remain

Arbitration offers employers a method of resolving disputes with employees that has a number of advantages over litigation. It is faster and less expensive than a court proceeding, it is less likely to generate negative publicity, and it eliminates the employer's exposure to a potentially hostile forum.

But employees, perceiving that arbitration may produce less favorable results than traditional litigation, frequently pursue their employment-related disputes in court despite having signed an arbitration agreement. Employers respond to this litigation by insisting that the Federal Arbitration Act requires the court to stay the proceeding and order the employee to arbitrate in accordance with the signed agreement.

The enforceability of arbitration agreements between employers and employees under the FAA, 9 U.S.C. [subsections] 1-14, is an unresolved and highly contested issue because of a provision in the act that renders at least some agreements unenforceable. Lower courts generally construe the provision broadly, making most employment-related arbitration agreements enforceable. Although the U.S. Supreme Court has not decided the issue, the Court's most recent pronouncement in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.(1) suggests that it is inclined toward the lower court view. Gilmer also shows that the Court is no longer open to general challenges to the adequacy of arbitration as a method of resolving employment-related disputes. It therefore appears that arbitration agreements between employers and employees generally are enforceable.

Moreover, Gilmer casts serious doubt on the continuing validity of an earlier line of Supreme Court cases that effectively granted employees an absolute right to litigate against their employers, regardless of any agreement to arbitrate, if the dispute involved a federal statutory claim. The circumstances under which an employee can avoid a signed arbitration agreement thus appear to be extremely limited.

Applicability of FAA

A. The FAA and Section 1

The Federal Arbitration Act was first enacted in 1925 and then re-enacted and codified in 1947 as Title 9 of the United States Code. Prior to its enactment, courts routinely held that arbitration agreements were unenforceable, whether they were between businesses, individuals, or employers and employees. The principal reason for non-enforcement has been described as an "irrational judicial hostility to arbitration in general."(2) It is well established that the FAA's purpose was to end this judicial hostility and make arbitration agreements as enforceable as other contracts.(3)

The FAA covers all types of commercial arbitration agreements, not just those between employers and employees. It provides (9 U.S.C. [sections] 2):

A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction ... shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.

The act calls for stays of proceedings in federal district courts when an issue in the proceeding is referable to arbitration, 9 U.S.C. [sections] 3, and for orders compelling arbitration when one party has failed to comply with an arbitration agreement, 9 U.S.C. [sections] 4.

The applicability of the FAA to arbitration agreements between employers and employees is unclear because of the provision in Section 1 of the act that renders it inapplicable to "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce." Section 1 clearly makes arbitration agreements unenforceable if the employees are seamen or railroad employees. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Enforcing Arbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.