Don't Mix Welfare and Immigration Reform

By Sutherland, Daniel W. | Insight on the News, February 13, 1995 | Go to article overview

Don't Mix Welfare and Immigration Reform


Sutherland, Daniel W., Insight on the News


The passion that fueled California's Proposition 187, which would prohibit illegal immigrants from receiving most government benefits, has propelled debate on the issue to the front pages of newspapers across the country. Citizens in Arizona, Texas and Florida are organizing campaigns to put referendums similar to Proposition 187 on their ballots in 1996. People in more than a dozen other states have expressed interest in organizing similar campaigns. Barbara Coe of the California Coalition for Immigration Reform told the Los Angeles Times, "We anticipated the passage of Proposition 187 would have a ripple effect across the nation. Right now, we feel like we are in the midst of a tidal wave, for goodness' sake!"

The politicians, as usual, are adept at reading the polls. California Gov. Pete Wilson took the message to Washington, proposing a federal version of Proposition 187 in a meeting with Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole and House Speaker Newt Gingrich and in a speech at the Heritage Foundation. Rep. Henry Hyde, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, expressed plans to introduce a national version of the proposition. However, making welfare benefits for illegal immigrants the focus of immigration reform might be the worst legacy of Proposition 187.

First, restricting public benefits for immigrants will not significantly affect the rate of illegal immigration. The consensus among immigration experts is that few immigrants are drawn to the United States because of public benefits. Illegal immigrants, who do not qualify for the vast majority of federal welfare benefits, come to this country almost exclusively because of abundant employment opportunities.

Second, focusing on welfare benefits will distract Washington from enacting the bold, fundamental reforms that would be truly successful. If Wilson and Proposition 187 sponsors continue to successfully monopolize the debate, Washington - Congress, its staff, advocacy groups and the press - will spend its limited time and attention span debating the emotional arguments for and against a federal Proposition 187. Meanwhile, vital reforms will be set aside. Congress should focus instead on a package of long-term and short-term solutions, including:

* Reform the federal immigration bureaucracy. A recent New York Times investigative series concluded that the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or INS, is "perhapsthe most troubled major agency in the federal government." After a 1990 General Accounting Office audit of the INS, the project director remarked, "I don't think we've found a federal agency this badly managed."

The INS is notorious for its weak management structure, faulty accounting systems and inaccurate information systems. Despite a long record of failure, the INS follows the life cycle of all bureaucracies: In the last four years, its budget has doubled. The Clinton administration claims it has "reinvented" the INS, but the agency needs much more than incremental reform. Congress should seriously study eliminating the INS and constructing a new agency from the ground up. In the interim, Congress should commission a private management-consulting firm to propose structural reforms in the INS.

* Aggressively expand trade with South America and Asia. The last commission to study the illegal-immigration problem comprehensively concluded in 1990 that "expanded trade between the sending countries and the United States is the single most important long-term remedy" to the problem. If people can obtain good jobs at home, they are much less likely to travel thousands of miles to live illegally here in the United States. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Don't Mix Welfare and Immigration Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.