The Impact of the Change in the Carnegie Classification System on Empirical Research in Higher Education Finance

By Adams, Olin L.,, III; Guarino, A. J. | Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, September 2005 | Go to article overview

The Impact of the Change in the Carnegie Classification System on Empirical Research in Higher Education Finance


Adams, Olin L.,, III, Guarino, A. J., Academy of Educational Leadership Journal


ABSTRACT

This study is an extension of previous research in higher education finance for which the 1994 classification of institutions by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching was a key independent variable. The Foundation changed its classification of institutions in 2000, and the authors investigated the resultant impact of the change on their prior empirical research in higher education finance. The results of this study suggest that the change in the Carnegie classification system is substantive. However, the findings of prior research were not so fundamentally altered as to corroborate critics of the system who claim that the revised classification destroys the comparability of institutions. Upon the occasion of its centennial year in 2005, the Carnegie Foundation can be expected to continue improvement of a system so influential in the conduct and the results of institutional research.

INTRODUCTION

The first author was the principal investigator on research in higher education finance for which the 1994 classification of institutions by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching was a key independent variable. The Foundation changed its classification of institutions in 2000. The new system emphasizes teaching, specifically the number and type of degrees an institution awards, rather than the conduct and external funding of research. The former categories of Research and Doctoral institutions have been replaced by a new taxonomy of Doctoral--Extensive and Doctoral--Intensive institutions. The classifications of master's and baccalaureate institutions remained in place (Basinger, 2000). Most of the published scholarship on the 2000 classification has focused on community colleges, ignoring four-year institutions.

The instant study explores the extent to which the results of prior empirical research in higher education finance changed because of the new classification system. Past research in higher education finance conducted by the first author focused on managerial accounting practices in colleges and universities, leading issues in higher education finance as perceived by college and university chief financial officers (CFOs), and outsourcing practices in higher education institutions.

MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING PRACTICES

Approaches to planning and control in the accounting systems of organizations may be defined as "managerial accounting practices". These internal accounting practices include systems of budgeting, costing, pricing, and performance measurement, as well as initiatives in outsourcing and efforts to change organizational behavior through fiscal policy. Effective budgeting systems address outputs of institutions (DeHayes and Lovrinic, 1994), planning for cash (Schwartz, 1992), and planning for the acquisition of long-term assets (Mangan, 1993). Successful approaches to budgeting also provide the flexibility to deal with changes in the volume of operations (Reed, 1992) and to make adjustments to budgets during the fiscal year (Howell and Sakurai, 1992).

Costing is the accumulation and analysis of cost information for an organization and its constituent parts. Costing remains, for most higher education institutions, in a developmental stage. More institutions, however, are recognizing the need to assign indirect costs to academic and administrative units, in order to arrive at a full cost of operations for the unit (Dempsey, 1997). A few institutions have embraced the activity-based costing model.

Pricing practices in colleges and universities vary by the extent to which an institution can subsidize price through reserves of institutional wealth or appropriations from a state (Winston, 1997). Many institutions, particularly private colleges and universities, have raised tuition and buffered the effect on affordablility by offering discounts in the form of institutional financial aid (Lapovsky and Hubbell, 2003). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impact of the Change in the Carnegie Classification System on Empirical Research in Higher Education Finance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.