International Diplomacy and Ethics: Relevance for Commerce

By O'Connor, Bernard J. | Journal of International Business Research, July 2004 | Go to article overview

International Diplomacy and Ethics: Relevance for Commerce


O'Connor, Bernard J., Journal of International Business Research


ABSTRACT

Diplomats are not guided by any specifically designed code of ethics ratified by the international political community. While individual countries such as the United States include Foreign Service personnel within the scope of their generic rules of professional conduct for government employees, diplomats per se are not identified according to the uniqueness of the ethical challenges confronting them. Nor are diplomats distinguished by their categories; whether they are assigned to embassies or as ad hoc mediators in crisis situations, as delegates to conferences or as representatives in the negotiation of treaties and Conventions. It is the position of this author that residential diplomats, those serving in their countries' embassies abroad, constitute a population whose duties and role suggest ethical principles which could well become foundational for any future international code of ethics. Six such principles are proposed. The significance of each is applied to aspects of international commerce, for example, how ethical commitment might influence the nature of assistance provided by embassy staff to a business seeking to establish itself in the embassy's receiving State. Scholarly expertise from the disciplines of diplomacy and international business demonstrates that the inherent affinities between these disciplines are made most apparent when ethical issues are the subject of analysis. Contrary to the image often generated by the media and even by the White House, residential diplomacy should be recognized as a positive contributor to the betterment of order and stability throughout the contemporary world.

INTRODUCTION

Rhetoric surrounding the recent U.S. invasion of Iraq regularly cited the apparent failure of prolonged diplomatic processes. President George W. Bush informed the nation during his televised speech of March 17, 2003, that the plan to send military force against Iraq was justified because of reasons which included Iraq's bad-faith negotiations with American and UN diplomatic representatives. According to the President, since the 1991 end of the Persian Gulf War, "the world has engaged in 12 years of diplomacy," and that, "The Iraqi regime has used diplomacy as a ploy to gain time and advantage."

The obvious conclusion is that Iraq's interaction with members of the world community was motivated solely by a national interest skewed at the hands of a tyrannical leadership, and by a deliberate preponderance of fraudulent efforts to thwart accountability. Iraq has been portrayed as maliciously irresponsible and unethical in the sum of its diplomatic ventures. But two points invite further consideration.

First, the general public has been sent a distinct message via the White House and the media that what transpired throughout successive meetings involving Iraq depicts the entirety of diplomatic practice. Given the purported failure of this kind of diplomacy, diplomacy itself was portrayed as having failed. Indeed, the popular press often suggested that the worth of conventional diplomacy was now radically reduced in significance and in credibility. Kevin Whitelaw, writing for U.S. News & World Report on March 24, 2003 (18-20), referred to a pre-invasion diplomatic session at the UN as resembling "a junior high school dance--painfully awkward, with every one self-consciously trying to score points with the same newly popular countries. The great powers spent the week cajoling and pressuring the six developing countries that just happened to be undecided nonpermanent members of the Security Council." The scene was described as chaotic, with the United States resorting to "devious strategies" to solicit the support of the "worried six" for its invasion design. Similarly, Fareed Zakaria, journalist for Newsweek, stated on March 31, 2003 (47), that the invasion scenario meant not only a threat to the continued viability of the UN, but signaled a serious obstacle in terms of "rebuild(ing) international trust between Washington and some of its key allies. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

International Diplomacy and Ethics: Relevance for Commerce
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.