The Workplace Religious Freedom Act: ADA Problems under a New Name

By Inman, Deborah F.; Inman, R. Anthony | Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, January 2003 | Go to article overview

The Workplace Religious Freedom Act: ADA Problems under a New Name


Inman, Deborah F., Inman, R. Anthony, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues


ABSTRACT

A number of problems for American businesses and workers have arisen as a result of the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). There is now a looming potential for similar problems with the introduction of the Workplace Religious Freedom Act (WRFA). While not yet a law, the WRFA has been introduced several times and will probably continue to be introduced until enactment. This paper looks at the problems caused by the ADA and provides detailed speculation as to how the same or similar problems can result from passage of the WRFA.

INTRODUCTION

Religious discrimination charges filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) are on the rise. EEOC data reveal that 1,939 charges were filed in the year 2000, up from 1,388 in 1992 ("Religion-Based Charges," 2001). In fact, religious-based discrimination charges are the third fastest growing claim, after sexual harassment and disability (Conlin, 1999). This makes the handling of religious expression in the workplace a volatile issue due to sometimes conflicting legal issues and strongly held personal beliefs (Zachery, 1996). "Under Title VII, employers are required to make a reasonable accommodation for an employee's religious beliefs unless doing so would impose an undue hardship. Although simply stated, the standard is hard to apply" (Levy, 2000). In an attempt to clarify religious accommodation, some members of Congress are attempting to modify Title VII through the passage of the Workplace Religious Freedom Act (WRFA) of 2002 (Gaddy, 2002). Senators John Kerry (D-Massachusetts) and Dan Coats (R-Indiana) and Representative William Goodling (R-Pennsylvania) first introduced WRFA in Congress in 1997 (Baker and Daniels, 2000). The bill failed to pass but was re-introduced in 1998 ("Religious Freedom in the Workplace, 2001). Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-New York) re-introduced the bill in 2000 (Baker and Daniels, 2000), leading to its debate by the House Education & Workforce Committee and the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations (Bill Summary & Status for the 106th Congress, 2001). In May, 2002 the bill was introduced by a bipartisan coalition and subsequently referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (Gaddy, 2002). Title VII prohibits workplace discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Unlike the other Title VII categories, no absolute prohibition exists against discrimination based on religion (Bennett-Alexander and Pincus, 1998). As the law now stands, the employer must reasonably accommodate an employee's religious practices unless the accommodation results in an undue hardship. The U.S. Supreme Court [TWA v. Hardison 432 U.S. 63 (1977)] has defined the term undue hardship as anything more than a minimal effort or expense (Hansen, 1998).

The WRFA, as proposed, consists of these five changes to Title VII (Baker and Daniels, 2000):

The definition of "undue hardship" would be comparable to that found in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); that which is seen as a "significant difficulty or expense."

WRFA would clarify for the courts the considerations defining "significant difficulty or expense." First, the court would question if the employee could not perform the essential function of the job as a result of not being accommodated. Next, the court would consider the cost of accommodation, the number of employees involved and for multi-facility employers, the level of extra administrative and fiscal burden that would result from geographic differences.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it would be an undue hardship for an employer if the company had to violate the seniority provision in a union collective bargaining agreement in order to accommodate an employee. Under WRFA, a company may no longer adhere to the seniority provision. Employees would be able to accommodate religious beliefs by exchanging shifts, even if this were in violation of a seniority system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Workplace Religious Freedom Act: ADA Problems under a New Name
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.