The Double Standard Environmental Science: Can Science Abide Political Causes?

By Trimble, Stanley W. | Regulation, Summer 2007 | Go to article overview

The Double Standard Environmental Science: Can Science Abide Political Causes?


Trimble, Stanley W., Regulation


'Everyone knows that soil erosion is a U.S. crisis. This study can't be right." That statement is a paraphrase of a reviewer's comments on a paper on greatly declining rates of U.S. soil erosion that I submitted to the journal Science in 1982.

For Science, as a matter of policy, it took only one negative review to reject my paper; the reviewer's disbelief meant the journal would not publish my findings. No matter that the study was sponsored by several government agencies and overseen by the U.S. Geological Survey, that it had involved thousands of person-hours by three generations of scientists over a period of 44 years, and that it had used precise and massive on-the-ground measurements to reach its findings. My offense was demonstrating that soil erosion in one region of the Midwest was only a small fraction of what it had been in the 1920s and 1930s, with the clear implication that the same improvements were occurring elsewhere in the country.

My experience suggested to me that ideology, not science, had established a significant grip on the top scientific press. This article attempts to portray the emotionalism, exaggeration, and even ideological viciousness--qualities that to me define extremism--that have invaded the field of environmental science. It also considers the different standards of evidence required for pessimistic, as opposed to optimistic, views on environmental problems. As a backdrop, I will use my own specialty, soil erosion. This article also considers the scientific objectivity of some prominent, if perhaps extreme, players in environmental science and the implications of some of their actions.

HEROES AND HERETICS

It should have been clear to me well before 1982 that there was a new Zeitgeist. The continuing doomsday pronouncements of Paul Ehrlich had gotten him (and still get him) unending appearances on late night television, rock-star status on college campuses, and seemingly unlimited access to influential platforms in top scientific journals. Ehrlich has his critics, of course, but he summarily dismisses them--hardly the essence of rational scientific dialogue.

And there are many other environmental bandwagons being promoted. Starting in 1984, the annual State of the World report by the World Watch Institute (WWI), headed by Lester Brown, has become a major crisis mill. The specialty of WWI is serving up huge doses of theorized Malthusian starvation on a worldwide scale, sometimes based on inflated soil erosion predictions. This group, like many others, rarely encounters a mere environmental problem; it is always a crisis and, as with Paul Ehrlich, doomsday is just around the corner if draconian steps are not taken immediately. Like Ehrlich, Brown has been well rewarded for his trouble, in this case receiving a MacArthur Foundation "genius" award and the UN Environmental Prize, and has been described by the Washington Post as "one of the world's most influential thinkers."

SIMON'S WAGER While I have been involved in environmental science for almost 40 years, I am not politically active. I learned early on to avoid academic bandwagons of any sort and that true scholarship can scarcely abide political causes. My own teaching, research, writing, and family commitments left me little time and I must admit that I was not following the more general environmental debates.

With discretionary time as a Fulbright fellow at Oxford in 1995, I accidentally discovered the work of the late American economist Julian Simon. I had earlier heard of Simon's famed bet with Ehrlich about the future scarcity of a basket of natural resources. In 1980, Simon offered to bet $10,000 that any specified raw material would drop in price over time. Ehrlich and two colleagues gleefully accepted the bet, commenting that "the lure of easy money can be irresistible." Ehrlich and the others selected chromium, copper, nickel, tin, and tungsten, with a time lapse of 10 years. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Double Standard Environmental Science: Can Science Abide Political Causes?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.