Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Interaction Goals and Facework

By Cai, Deborah A.; Wilson, Steven R. | Communication Studies, Winter 2000 | Go to article overview

Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Interaction Goals and Facework


Cai, Deborah A., Wilson, Steven R., Communication Studies


**********

Compliance-gaining episodes have been described as complex because they often involve the attempt to pursue multiple, conflicting goals (O'Keefe, 1988). Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory offers one account for the potential complexity of compliance gaining. From this viewpoint, seeking to alter another person's behavior is inherently face threatening; hence, speakers use politeness to balance the competing goals of encouraging compliance and supporting the message target's face. Unfortunately, there are several problems with the politeness theory analysis, including its inability to explain why multiple, distinct threats to face arise in different compliance-gaining situations (Craig, Tracy, & Spisak, 1986; Wilson, Aleman, & Leatham, 1998).

In a revised analysis of face, Wilson and colleagues (Wilson et al., 1998; Wilson, Kim, & Meischke, 1991/1992; Wilson & Kunkel, 2000) argue that individuals associate specific influence goals, such as asking favors or enforcing unfulfilled obligations, with distinct potential threats to both parties' face. Participants' interaction goals and messages (facework) thus vary across situations defined by different influence goals. This study explores the applicability of the revised analysis to persons from Japan as well as the U.S. Specifically, we look at how students from these two national cultures manage multiple goals in compliance-gaining situations defined by two influence goals (favors versus obligations) and involving two types of relationships (same-sex friends versus acquaintances). To provide a background for the study, we review the revised analysis of face during compliance-gaining episodes. Research on individualism-collectivism then is discussed to explain possible differences between Japanese and U.S. cultures in the face goals individuals pursue when seeking compliance with friends and acquaintances.

A REVISED ANALYSIS OF FACE AND FACEWORK

Building on Goffman's (1967) classic analysis, Brown and Levinson (1987) posit two types of face: positive and negative. Positive face is the concern individuals have for their own image and approval by significant others. Negative face is the concern individuals have for their own autonomy. Individuals can protect their own positive or negative face, protect another's positive or negative face, or even attack the other's face (Craig et al., 1986; Wilson, 1990).

It long has been recognized that speakers often form and pursue multiple goals when seeking a message target's compliance, including goals relevant to both parties' face (Clark & Delia, 1979; Dillard, Segrin, & Harden, 1989; Hample & Dallinger, 1990; Lim & Bowers, 1991; O'Keefe, 1988; Schrader & Dillard, 1998; Tracy, Craig, Smith, & Spisak, 1984). What has not been as clearly understood until recently is why speakers would pursue distinct sets of goals in different compliance-gaining situations. Why would speakers tend to worry about not imposing too much on the target and not looking lazy themselves in one situation, but tend to worry instead about allowing the target to make his or her own decision and not looking nosy themselves in a second situation?

According to Wilson and colleagues' (1998) revised analysis of face, speakers who seek compliance identify and orient to potential threats to both parties' face by relying on two widely-shared sources of knowledge. The first type is knowledge about the defining conditions (i.e., constitutive rules) for performing directives (e.g., requests, recommendations), the class of speech acts at the heart of any attempt to seek compliance (Searle, 1976; Tracy et al., 1984). The second type is knowledge of influence goals, or common reasons why speakers attempt to alter a target's behavior. Individuals interpret compliance-gaining episodes based on their understandings of specific influence goals. During such an episode, the influence goal "brackets the situation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Interaction Goals and Facework
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.