Question: Is It Time to End Affirmative Action for Women? Yes: Women Don't Need Extra Help

By Larson, Elizabeth | Insight on the News, April 24, 1995 | Go to article overview

Question: Is It Time to End Affirmative Action for Women? Yes: Women Don't Need Extra Help


Larson, Elizabeth, Insight on the News


You've come a long way, baby! In just a few decades, we have seen women stride into the workplace in record numbers, taking their place alongside men as construction workers and computer analysts, physicians

I 1- and politicians. And, with an initiative slated for the California ballot in 1996 that would end granting preferential treatment to anyone on the basis of sex (see Insight, Feb. 20), the end is in sight for what may be, ironically, the last universal barrier to women's advancement - affirmative action.

The California Civil Rights Initiative, or CCRI - which proposes that "Neither the State of California nor any of its political subdivisions or agents shall use race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin as a criterion for either discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group" - has begun a fight that will quickly assume a central role on the national stage. This battle promises to upset all our assumptions about affirmative action as a well-intentioned idea gone astray in a minefield of quotas and diatribes against heterosexual white males.

Supporters of CCRI claim the initiative would return government policy to the original intent of the civil-rights movement: judging people by the content of their character - or the facts on their resume - rather than by the color of their skin or their gender. They criticize the architects of affirmative action with shifting their focus from eradication of bias to ensuring equality of outcome. CCRI's opponents say passage of the measure would strip women and minorities of their major form of protection against prejudice in a continually discriminatory workplace. Equality of outcome, they seem to be saying, is even more important than equality of opportunity. According to a Los Angeles Times poll conducted in early March, Californians favor the CCRI 66 percent to 26 percent. When a Gallup Poll in February asked whether "affirmative-action programs are needed to help women overcome discrimination," 57 percent of women said no.

Affirmative action has, in fact, done more harm to women than all the good it promised in the heady days of its implementation. A woman pays a high price for a job received through affirmative action: the unspoken assumption that she really wasn't the best man for the job. Like a double scarlet letter on her double-breasted suit, the suspicions aroused by quotas usually are undeserved and thus all the more insidious. Resentment against an individual case of hiring by quota mushrooms into resentment against all members of the privileged group. Intended to reverse discrimination, affirmative action ends up breeding it.

Yet, to argue that women do not need affirmative action is not to deny the existence of individual cases of discrimination based on sex. The CCRI is not about whether there still are people who discriminate against women and minorities in the workplace or in society.

The rejection of affirmative action is, instead, a rejection of the idea that group rights supersede individual rights, that broad-based government policies are necessary because women cannot make it on their own and that legally enforced quotas are required every time statistics show an inequality in the workforce. Women struggled for too long to free themselves of the yoke of paternalism - legal and social ties subjugating them to their fathers, brothers and husbands - to turn so easily to another paternal figure, Uncle Sam. Yet this is exactly what many women are rushing to do. This ought to be abhorrent to true feminists, both as an attitude about women's abilities to achieve independence and as a means of undermining the real gains women have made on their own in recent decades.

Statistics used by feminists to prove the existence of ongoing discrimination against women in the workplace rely on an artificial wage gap. Women's median pay as a percentage of men's (which rose from 60 percent in 1980 to 72 percent in 1990) is depressed by including all women of all ages in all jobs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Question: Is It Time to End Affirmative Action for Women? Yes: Women Don't Need Extra Help
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.