America's Home Front

By Jeansonne, Glen | History Today, May 1995 | Go to article overview

America's Home Front


Jeansonne, Glen, History Today


Neither the European theatre where they fought the German war machine, nor the Pacific, where they were locked in deadly combat with the Japanese, was the most lethal area of operations for Americans during the Second World War. in both theatres combined, some 200,000 Americans died in combat. Yet a third front - the home front - was the site of some 300,000 fatalities due to industrial accidents (see Geoffrey Perrett's book Days of Sadness, Years of Triumph, in which he cites statistics on industrial accidents from official figures issued for 1942-46).

The sacrifices of American civilians were instrumental in winning the war, and Americans overpowered the Axis Powers, not so much by force of arms but by massive industrial might. The United States armed forces, more formidably armed and equipped than their adversaries, killed 500,000 enemy soldiers at a cost of $400 billion, or about $800,000 for every enemy soldier killed. It cost the United States approximately $1 million in arms, equipment, and personnel, for every $1 million of Axis property it destroyed. The irony that it would have cost less to buy out the enemy than destroy him is combined with the reality that in a conflict of such massive scope, a war of attrition rather than of finesse or raw courage, the Germans and Japanese had committed themselves to a war they could not possibly win.

The home front was a place of trial and triumph. Many of the more glamourised, essential jobs in industry were dirty and dangerous and Americans took them more out of economic necessity than from a sense of patriotism. Yet there is no denying that an unprecedented effort produced an economic juggernaut that overwhelmed the enemy. During the course of the war American industry produced 86,000 tanks; 296,000 aircraft; 15,000,000 rifles; 5,400 merchant ships; and 6,500 warships. The United States has proven that it can turn out from 8,000 to 10,000 aircraft a month', Stalin said in 1943. Russia can turn out, at most, 3,000 aircraft a month ... The United States, therefore, is a country of machines. Without the use of those machines, through Lend-lease, we would lose this war'.

If the principal Soviet contribution to the Allied effort was manpower, and the British contribution was perseverance and gritty determination, the American contribution was production. Six months after Pearl Harbor, American factories were producing more than all the Axis nations combined; before the end of the war the United States alone was producing twice as much as its enemies. Yet Americans who lived through the war years remember it as a time of minor inconveniences rather than major sacrifices, a time of prosperity and purpose when the nation was more unified than ever before or since.

Such rosy memories overshadow the reality that the purpose of war is to kill and avoid being killed; that it necessitated separation, dislocation, and rapid change that stretched the fabric of national unity. Submerged in the glow 6f patriotic reminiscence were race riots, juvenile delinquency, housing shortages, ethnic tensions, violations of civil liberties, the stridency of demagogic agitators, and the beginning of a trend that saw the nuclear family dissolve under the disparate pressures of work, responsibilities to children, and responsibility to the national cause. The Second World War was a good war not in an absolute but in a comparative sense when one views it in the context of the wars that preceded and succeeded it, wars fraught with moral ambiguity that ended in less than total victory. Fifty years after the conclusion of the world's greatest conflict, Americans continue to marvel at their accomplishments and pay the price for them.

The spectre of the Great Depression that had haunted 1930s America was exorcised by the total mobilisation necessary to rid the world of the totalitarian menace. The shortage of jobs that had plagued the 1930s was supplanted by a shortage of manpower; unemployment not only disappeared but women, including those with children, minorities, the retired, the elderly and to some extent the disabled, were sucked in to fill the vacuum created by the departure of 12 million men in uniform and the unprecedented demand for the products of American farms and factories. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

America's Home Front
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.