Ethics and Liberation Theology

By Schubeck, Thomas L. | Theological Studies, March 1995 | Go to article overview

Ethics and Liberation Theology


Schubeck, Thomas L., Theological Studies


Readers of this journal received their first look at liberation theology in 1970 when Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutierrez published his "Notes for a Theology of Liberation," a ground-breaking essay that the editor called "theological dynamite."(1) Nearly two decades later in this same journal, Richard McCormick hailed this Latin American theology as one of the significant developments within moral theology over the past half century.(2) He identified three ways in which liberation theology has influenced moral theology. It first demolished the separatist mentality that dichotomizes reality into the profane and the sacred and replaced it with a perspective that sees Christ's action permeating every dimension of human existence. Second, it expanded the Church's mission of charity to include active participation in constructing a just order. Liberation theologians call this active form of charity "praxis."(3) Third, liberation theology reminded Christians, and continues to remind them at every turn, that morality should give primacy to social concerns and not yield to the individualism rampant in Western industrialized democracies.

While certain theologians, like Gregory Baum, Marciano Vidal, and J. Philip Wogaman, would concur that liberation theology has influenced moral thinking in important and perhaps lasting ways, others, like James Gustafson, Michael Novak, and Dennis McCann have raised questions about these ways and about the ethics of liberation theology in general.(4) This note will examine those issues in liberation ethics that have recently appeared in the theological literature, focusing primarily on how the preferential option for the poor relates to God's universal love and to ethical concepts, especially to the common good, justice, and human rights. It will conclude with a discussion of its moral identity: What kind of ethics is liberation ethics? The points raised in these notes arise mainly from a dialogue between theologians from Latin America and theologians of North America, Western Europe, and the Philippines.(5)

Preferential Option for the Poor

The concept "preferential option for the poor" first arose at the Second Conference of Latin American Bishops at Medellin in 1968 and was formally defined by the bishops in their Third Conference at Puebla in 1979. This option, the bishops said, calls the whole Church to a conversion and to a "commitment to the poor . . . aimed at their integral liberation." Answering this call means acknowledging and supporting the efforts of the poor to organize themselves and to reclaim their rights. Moreover, solidarity with the poor urges the Church to denounce "grave injustices stemming from mechanisms of oppression."(6) Since Puebla, Pope John Paul II, the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, and the bishops of Canada and the United States have all affirmed the preferential option in their respective teachings.(7) This option, the linchpin of liberation theology and its ethics, has become, even with its strong hierarchical support by the pope and bishops, "the most controversial religious term since the Reformers' cry, 'Salvation through faith alone.'"(8) It draws vigorous opposition as well as enthusiastic support.

Its opponents attack it on many fronts: theological, ethical, social-scientific, and epistemological. On the theological front, critics say the preferential option seems to circumscribe God's universal love by implying that God loves the poor more than the nonpoor and that God channels salvation exclusively through the poor. This perspective suggests that the Church should work with the downtrodden and forget the wealthy.(9) On the ethical front, critics charge that liberation ethics, by using preferential option as its foundational principle, seems to turn traditional ethics on its head. Traditional philosophical ethics and moral theology insist that moral thinking be impartial; they reject partiality, therefore, because by definition it gives unfair advantage to one group. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ethics and Liberation Theology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.