Adolescent Treatment: Advancing as a Specialty; A New Endorsement from NAADAC Builds Momentum for Clinical Standards
Bowers, Chris, Hall, Denise, Durkee, Steven, Howard, Tiffany, Taber, Margie, Mikell, Shirley Beckett, Addiction Professional
In 2004, 19.1 million Americans, or 7.9% of the population 12 or older, were current illicit drug users.' The report from which these numbers are derived goes on to suggest that 21. (1) million people who needed treatment for their drug use did not receive treatment. These statistics have been consistent since about 2002 and have led some researchers to suggest that roughly 10% of the adolescent population could transition from experimental use of substances to more frequent use or abuse, or both. (2,3)
In response to the data, there has been a growing call for more research around adolescent substance use. Ahmed and colleagues suggest that when working with adolescents it is essential to understand the conflicts existing in their world that affect the issue of substance use; these researchers call for a set of developmentally appropriate criteria when considering adolescent assessment versus adult assessment of substance use disorders. (4) Lowman likewise suggests that treatment should include developmentally appropriate interventions for adolescents, as opposed to simply taking existing treatment interventions and "modifying" them for an adolescent. (5)
Substantial research in recent years has encouraged the use of developmental psychology as a basis for treating adolescents with a substance use diagnosis. (6,7,8,9,10) Given not only the call for additional cooperation between researchers and practitioners, but also hearing what clients in treatment are clearly reporting they need for effective treatment, (11,12,13,14) all of this, served as a basis for convening a group of individuals that would be known as the Adolescent Specialty Committee of NAADAC, The Association for Addiction Professionals.
Association for a vital purpose
The NAADAC Adolescent Specialty Committee began in the spring of 2004. From the start this has been a collaborative work in NAADAC by those holding the view that adolescents in treatment should have sufficient clinical care that is easy to access and uniquely tailored to their needs. The ASC mission statement was written out of this vision: "To advocate for effective clinical services addressing prevention and treatment for adolescent substance use disorders." Working within NAADAC, the committee does this through:
* Promoting public and professional understanding of the impact of adolescent substance use disorders upon families, schools, juvenile justice, peer influences, and the overall health and emotional wellness of the adolescent;
* Advocating for adequate substance abuse prevention, education, and intervention services;
* Supporting best practice clinical efforts by NAADAC treatment professionals; and
* Encouraging acceptance of the clinical uniqueness of today's adolescents and their families.
Building on their initial momentum, several committee members met with the editor of Addiction Professional at the 2004 NAADAC conference. The ensuing conversation resulted in an ongoing column about adolescents and their treatment, with the first column (published in the magazine's May 2005 issue) addressing Motivational Interviewing with adolescents. To maintain communication among ASC members across the United States, a Yahoo! group e-mail exchange has been regularly utilized to examine
ongoing issues related to adolescent treatment.
The committee's vital purpose expanded through collaborative work with NAADAC staff and NAADAC's National Certification Commission on a mutual interest in recognizing clinicians who have worked in depth with adolescents. ASC leadership teamed up with the National Certification Commission on developing a formal endorsement--an acknowledgement of addiction counselors and mental health practitioners who have demonstrated a fine measure of clinical capability in working with adolescents in substance abuse treatment.
Steady efforts to pursue a clinically focused list of questions for an endorsement test ensued; this also involved some collaboration with the federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) on the test bibliography. …