Continental Drift: The Lisbon Treaty Effectively Changes Little but Has Been Greeted with Suspicion in Britain. Many Are Convinced It Marks Yet Another Transfer of Sovereignty to Brussels. Vernon Bogdanor Examines the UK's Uneasy Relationship with the European Union

By Bogdanor, Vernon | New Statesman (1996), October 29, 2007 | Go to article overview

Continental Drift: The Lisbon Treaty Effectively Changes Little but Has Been Greeted with Suspicion in Britain. Many Are Convinced It Marks Yet Another Transfer of Sovereignty to Brussels. Vernon Bogdanor Examines the UK's Uneasy Relationship with the European Union


Bogdanor, Vernon, New Statesman (1996)


A happy man, Bagehot says, is not forever repairing his house. Yet the Lisbon Treaty, if ratified, will be the fifth constitutional amendment to the Treaty of Rome, in addition to the enlargement treaties, since 1985. The treaty provides for a minimal transfer of powers to European institutions, and most of those, on matters such as humanitarian aid and energy policy, are clearly in Britain's interest. Indeed, energy liberalisation, which has been of great benefit to Britain, would never have been secured without qualified majority voting.

The main effect of the treaty is to clarify the institutional structure of the European Union. But the Laeken declaration of 2001, which led to the Convention on the Future of Europe, and then to both the ill-fated constitution and the treaty, sought more than this minimal approach, calling for a "clear, open, effective, democratically controlled community". The treaty, however, does little to make the EU more democratic or more accountable. It alters the balance between the institutions of the union, but not the balance between the institutions and the people of Europe. It does nothing to make the EU less of an alienated superstructure.

Although the treaty is a highly minimalist document, it has aroused a predictable outbreak of hostility in Britain, with renewed calls for a referendum which Gordon Brown is determined to resist. The referendum proposal, however, has found favour with MPs from all parties. For Europe is an issue which cuts across party allegiances. In the 1980s, it helped to break up the Labour Party. In the 1990s, it threatened to do the same to the Conservatives in the battle over the ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.

Why has Europe had such convulsive effects? In 1962, after Harold Macmillan had applied to join the European Economic Community, as it was then called, the then Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell declared that a federal Europe would mean "the end of a thousand years of history". Joining the community represented a commitment quite unlike that involved in joining any other international organisation such as the United Nations or Nato. For it involved a transfer of sovereignty to a body--the Council of Ministers of the European Community--which was not and could not be responsible to Westminster. As the European Court of Justice held in the case of Costa v ENEL, in 1964, nine years before Britain joined the community: "The transfer by the states from their domestic legal systems to the community legal system of the rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights."

Opponents of the 2003 European constitution who attacked it on the grounds that it would make British law subordinate to European law failed to appreciate that this had been so ever since Britain joined the community in 1973. It is the very raison d'etre of the whole European enterprise. Moreover, the supremacy of community law could be enforced against national governments and legislatures by national courts. In a case in 1962, Van Genden Loos, the European Court of Justice held that the Treaty of Rome, establishing the community, was not just "an agreement which merely creates rights and obligations between the contracting states" but "a new legal order of international law for the benefit of which the states have limited their sovereign rights, and the subjects of which comprise not only the member states, but also their nationals".

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

These two doctrines--the doctrine of the supremacy of European law and the doctrine of direct effect--entailed a revolution in our constitutional thought. For it meant that, for all practical purposes, parliament would no longer be sovereign. As early as 1971, a leading constitutional lawyer, SA de Smith, defined the community as "an inchoate functional federation". The Treaty of Rome in 1957 had declared that its signatories were determined "to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe". …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Continental Drift: The Lisbon Treaty Effectively Changes Little but Has Been Greeted with Suspicion in Britain. Many Are Convinced It Marks Yet Another Transfer of Sovereignty to Brussels. Vernon Bogdanor Examines the UK's Uneasy Relationship with the European Union
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.