Blair's Laws: An Audit of a Depressing Decade

By Foster, Charles | Contemporary Review, Autumn 2007 | Go to article overview

Blair's Laws: An Audit of a Depressing Decade


Foster, Charles, Contemporary Review


MERE numbers sometimes tell a story eloquently. Most civilized nations make laws reluctantly, recognising that any law is a form of violence--a type of coercion by the state which should be avoided if at all possible. To make a lot of laws says a lot. It says that the legislature does not trust individuals or existing institutions. It says that the legislature thinks that it is the best arbiter of the public good. In a common law jurisdiction such as the UK used to be, it indicates that the legislature does not trust the judges to produce bespoke solutions to the new problems inevitably generated by society's growing complexity. All this should be profoundly worrying to anyone concerned about fundamental freedoms.

Tony Blair has been the most fecund spawner of new law ever. Over the decade of his increasingly presidential reign, an average of 2685 new laws were enacted each year. That is almost seven and a half laws each day, or one every three and a quarter hours. This represents a 22 per cent increase over the average for the preceding decade under Margaret Thatcher and John Major. These figures do not include the many thousands of new laws automatically grafted into the UK law by virtue of the UK's membership of the European Union. In 2006 alone there were over 2100 new European regulations affecting the UK. The total since 1997 is 4785--13 every day [1].

What are we to make of the change in the pace of legislation? The longer Blair stayed as Prime Minister, the faster new laws appeared. If what was done in the early years was any good, one would intuitively expect it to be the other way round. Surely such legislative hyper-activity denotes a Prime Minister in love with power; intoxicated with the ability to compel and control. The number of enactments alone does not tell the full story of this hysterical over-legislation. Statutes under Blair became far longer. In 2006 five Acts totalled more than 100 pages, three more than 200, one more than 300, one more than 500 and one more than 700.

As well as being an effective piece of political litmus, giving a result devastating to Blair's reputation, the volume of legislation created some massive practical problems. There are three important groups who need to know what the law says. First, there are the bureaucrats who have to generate systems for disseminating and implementing the law. They, together with the lawyers who feed parasitically on legal complexity, have been the principal beneficiaries of Blair's mania for law-making. They have become more numerous, although more confused and less effective. Second, there are the judges, who have the unenviable job of trying to make sense of the legislation. Their disgust with the trend towards more law oozes out of almost every Court of Appeal judgment dealing with the appalling Criminal Justice Act 2003. And then there is the public. It is rather important that everyone knows or can easily know the limitations placed by the State on his behaviour. When the judges say that the law is dangerously incoherent, there are constitutional worries going far beyond mere inconvenience.

The Significance of Method

It is tragically necessary to assert some trite things that appear in Chapter One of any school book on politics. They have been forgotten in the Blair years. Here is one. A decent, confident government, properly recognising its relationship (servant) to the legislature (master), legislates in major matters primarily through Acts of Parliament. Over many hundreds of years a simple and effective system for parliamentary scrutiny of legislation has evolved. The mechanics do not matter here. The point of this system is the point of Parliament itself: no legislation without representation. And one can't be properly represented unless the representative knows what legislation is being proposed.

Parliamentary time is tremendously valuable, and of course in most democracies it is recognised that for formal or minor legislation there needs to be an alternative system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Blair's Laws: An Audit of a Depressing Decade
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.