France's New President

By Ramsay, Allan | Contemporary Review, Autumn 2007 | Go to article overview

France's New President


Ramsay, Allan, Contemporary Review


NICOLAS Sarkozy, Secretary General of the UMP, succeeded President Jacques Chirac, as President of France on 16 May, becoming the sixth President of the Fifth Republic and the thirty-seventh overall. He defeated his Socialist Party (PS) rival, Mme Segolene Royal, in the second ballot on 6 May, gaining 53 per cent of votes cast to her 47 per cent. This was a slightly higher figure than he gained in the first round a fortnight earlier for which there were twelve candidates, including one from the fishing, shooting and hunting constituency, not red-coated squires and Sloanes in Barbours as in Britain, but village postmen, shopkeepers and artisans whose slogan, La rusticite d'abord, was not enough to win more than 1.4 per cent of the votes cast, less than the 4.2 per cent registered by his predecessor in the 2002 elections. All minority parties fared as badly. France's is an overwhelmingly urban population and every year that passes, like the election issues themselves, emphasises this.

The election was the culmination of what is, by any measurement, an inordinately long process in which neither of the two main candidates started as outright favourite. It began when M. Sarkozy was elected to the Secretary Generalship of the UMP over a year ago. President Chirac did not like this since he had other ideas about a successor. He would have preferred M. Juppe or M. de Villepin but Juppe's time is over and Villepin has the wrong profile. M. Sarkozy was not to be deflected by any of the tempting baits Chirac offered him. Mme. Royal had a similarly unenthusiastic endorsement by her party leadership. She effectively imposed herself on the PS through a combination of populism, based on her Poitou-Charente constituency, and skilful use of the Internet through her website, Desirs de I' avenir. (The title reflects the roseate glow of what people think Mme. Royal means by 'participitative democracy'.) She thus neutralised the Secretary General of the PS, her own partner, M. Francois Hollande, and more politically significant figures like M. Fabius and M. Strauss-Kahn. The former party leader M. Jospin's endorsement of Mme. Royal--the ultimate benediction--was late, reluctant and lukewarm. He took a less active part in the campaign than the former President of the EU commission, Jacques Delors. Both candidates, more especially Mme. Royal, might thus be said to have succeeded in spite of rather than because of their respective parties, though M. Sarkozy had the advantage of a more coherent and coordinated party support once he became their candidate, something which Mme. Royal never enjoyed.

Opinion polls were frequent. M. Sarkozy's campaign team acknowledged that they used them as part of their weaponry. Mme. Royal never enjoyed the advantage of leading in the polls once the campaign really got going, even though she never trailed by much. Her support was strongest among the disenfranchised, perhaps the only luxury they had. When Le Monde canvassed the down and outs in Marseilles, they opted unanimously for her though it must have been small comfort for their heroine since none of them had a vote. The opinion polls showed very little variation in the underlying dispositions of the public until M. Bayrou entered the lists. What he seems to have done is to have absorbed most of the large element of 'don't knows' built into any French presidential election, this one perhaps more than most. There are reasons for this which are addressed below but 'don't know' in French political language does not mean 'don't care'. The French voter values his vote and weighs it carefully, he wants to get it right and his mood changes. Had the elections taken place in January Mme. Royal might have won, playing, as one commentator put it, on the French yearning for a state of permanent maternage. Her own icon is St Joan of Arc; but since de Gaulle also invoked her it proves nothing beyond the appeal of the eternal feminine and the ambivalence this arouses in the French male. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

France's New President
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.