Humanism and the Paradox of Politics

By Milam, Michael C. | The Humanist, November-December 1995 | Go to article overview

Humanism and the Paradox of Politics

Milam, Michael C., The Humanist

The political climate in America, at least that generated by and maintained in the popular media, appears to become more polarized, impassioned, and irrational every day. According to the talk-show hosts - and even by the very manner in which the media presents the opinions of average citizens - a shallow, narrow, minded, and prejudiced diatribe deserves just as much consideration as a subtle, well-reasoned position. Rational political debate on a national level - the keystone of any democracy - is dangerously lacking. As a result, the student of history shudders when considering this climate of glorified hysteria, demagoguery, scapegoating, and intolerance, because tolerant and prosperous times rarely follow periods of passionate chaos. Now that the United States is about to begin another presidential election year, it certainly is time to reflect upon the attitude that a humanist should adopt under such circumstances.

It has been often lamented that humanists seem unwilling or unable to take a more active role in politics - or, at least, that they seem unwilling or unable to organize into an effective force for social change. The irony in this situation is only too apparent. Humanists consider themselves to be intelligent, rational human beings with a genuine care and concern for humanity in general, yet humanists all too often consider the messy realities of partisan politics outside the proper sphere of their efforts as humanists. Then, too, from the perspective of humanism, political compromise and expediency an too often lead to lessons in how humanistic aspirations are turned into inhumane systems: the Enlightenment ideals of Voltaire and Rousseau twisted into the Reign of Terror; Marx's ideals of economic equality and social justice corrupted into the Gulag Archipelago; and laissez faire (or "supply side") economics - the well-spring of political liberalism - used to justify the virtual enslavement of a large working class by a small elite.

So as the end of the twentieth century approaches, the very idea that social justice can be achieved through political action is thrown into question by a justifiable pessimism. There seems to be a general feeling that the humanist, even while burning with the intense desire for social justice, is forever alienated from meaningful political action that just when a humanist politics is so necessary, it is so impossible. This paradox is nothing new. On the contrary, it has been present throughout the history of Western civilization. In fact, the paradox of politics is definitive of humanism and brings out, once again, the central dynamic of Western culture: the eternal conflict between the individual and the collective.

Before we consider the uneasy relationship between humanism and politics, however, a redefinition of both words is in order. Since the birth of humanism in the city states of ancient Greece, humanists have taken pride in rationality and integrity above all. Rationality, in this enlightened sense, is the ability of reason to harness and put to creative and benevolent use the primal emotional energies and proclivities of humankind's animal nature. Integrity, the companion of rationality, is the ability to put one's professed beliefs into the reality of action. Simply stated, integrity is the courage to make word and action coincide. Together, rationality and integrity bring a certain clarity and set of standards to human existence, allowing the human being to gain an objective point of orientation in life free from the unexamined dictates of mere self, interest and day-to-day existence. These traits are what make an individual an individual and not a bee in the hive or an ant in the hill. Even so, these two traits alone, however important to an understanding of humanism, cannot account for that endemic spirit and orientation - that elan - which characterizes humanism in its more rigorous manifestations throughout history.

Besides rationality and integrity, therefore, the distinguishing feature of humanism is an affirmation of life on its own terms. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Humanism and the Paradox of Politics


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.