Antislavery Courts and the Dawn of International Human Rights Law

By Martinez, Jenny S. | The Yale Law Journal, January 2008 | Go to article overview

Antislavery Courts and the Dawn of International Human Rights Law


Martinez, Jenny S., The Yale Law Journal


ARTICLE CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

  I. ORIGINS OF THE ANTISLAVERY COURTS
     A. The Rise of British Abolitionism
     B. Abolitionism and British Foreign Policy, 1807-1814:
        Unilateralism
     C. British Foreign Policy at the End of the Napoleonic Wars: A
        Network of Treaties

 II. THE COURTS OF MIXED COMMISSION FOR THE ABOLITION OF THE
     SLAVE TRADE
     A. Overview of Court Operations
     B. The Courts in Operation: Impact and Limitations
        1. Impact: Volume of Cases
        2. Limitation: Nonparticipation
        3. Limitation: Other Loopholes
        4. Limitation: Reluctant Treaty Partners
        5. Limitation: Faltering Domestic Support
     C. From Crisis to Success: The Final Abolition of the Slave Trade
        1. Portugal
        2. Brazil
        3. Spain, Cuba, and the United States

III. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS:
     RETHINKING THEIR ORIGINS AND FUTURE

INTRODUCTION

Almost exactly two centuries ago, in March 1807, both the United States and Great Britain passed landmark legislation prohibiting the slave trade. The anniversary of this event has been marked with fanfare in both countries. (1) But these celebrations mask the fact that the transatlantic slave trade continued for another sixty years before it was finally suppressed. This Article is about those sixty years and the surprising and forgotten role that international law and international courts played in the extinction of the slave trade.

Between 1817 and 1871, bilateral treaties between Britain and several other countries (eventually including the United States) led to the establishment of international courts for the suppression of the slave trade. (2) Though all but forgotten today, these antislavery courts were the first international human rights courts. They were made up of judges from different countries. They sat on a permanent, continuing basis, and they applied international law. The courts explicitly aimed to promote humanitarian objectives. Though the courts were extremely active for only a few years, over the treaties' lifespan, the courts heard more than 600 cases and freed almost 80,000 slaves found aboard illegal slave trading vessels. (3) During their peak years of operation, the courts heard cases that may have involved as many as one out of every five or six ships involved in the transatlantic slave trade. (4)

These international antislavery courts have received scant attention from historians, (5) and legal scholars have almost completely ignored them. (6) To be sure, the cases they adjudicated represented only a fraction of the transatlantic slave trade from West Africa, and they left the East African slave trade untouched. Social, economic, political, and military factors created an environment amenable to the formation of the courts, and it is difficult to untangle the causal role played by these factors from the role of the courts themselves in the ultimate global abolition of the slave trade. The final suppression of the slave trade only occurred when changes in attitudes toward the trade in various countries led to effective enforcement of domestic laws against the traffic; these changes in domestic attitudes appear linked at least in part to international efforts to ban the slave trade, though other factors likely played a role as well. But regardless of the weight of various causal factors in the suppression of the slave trade, an international legal institution that had a direct and tangible impact on nearly 80,000 human lives should be far more than a footnote in the history of international law. Modern international courts--about which tens of thousands of scholarly pages have been spilled--measure their successes on a much smaller scale. (7)

In addition to its intrinsic historical interest, the story of the antislavery courts has important implications for contemporary issues in international law. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Antislavery Courts and the Dawn of International Human Rights Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.