# A Bayesian Method for Combining Results from Several Binomial Experiments

By Consonni, Guido; Veronese, Piero | Journal of the American Statistical Association, September 1995 | Go to article overview

# A Bayesian Method for Combining Results from Several Binomial Experiments

Consonni, Guido, Veronese, Piero, Journal of the American Statistical Association

1. INTRODUCTION

Consider a collection of I independent binomial experiments, with experiment i having size [n.sub.i] and success probability [[Theta].sub.i], i = 1, . . . , I. A typical Bayesian hierarchical approach would assume the [[Theta].sub.i]'s to be exchangeable, (see, for example, Albert and Gupta 1983, sec. 3, and Leonard 1972). Exchangeability at times may appear to be too strong an assumption; for example, when the value of a relevant covariate is available for each experiment and, more generally, when one suspects that the experiments may have various degrees of similarity in some respect. Even when no specific prior information is available, one may wish to adopt a more flexible approach, involving entertaining several partial exchangeability structures for the [[Theta].sub.i]'s and then combining the corresponding inferences. This idea has been suggested by Malec and Sedransk (1992) and implemented with normal data. Within a nonhierarchical setting, a very similar approach underpins the concept of "partition models" introduced by Hartigan (1990), later applied in a number of articles with Barry (see, for example, Barry and Hartigan, 1993).

Consider a partition of the experimental set {1, . . . , I}, whose subsets are denoted by [S.sub.1], . . . , [S.sub.d]. The basic assumption is to regard as exchangeable only the [[Theta].sub.i]'s associated with experiments belonging to the same partition subset [S.sub.k], whereas the [[Theta].sub.i]'s relative to experiments in distinct subsets are taken to be independent. Typically, there will be several partitions g whose relative plausibility is described by a prior probability mass function p(g). The final inference on [Theta] = ([[Theta].sub.1], . . . , [[Theta].sub.I]) will be a mixture, over the posterior distribution p(g[where]data), of the inferences on [Theta] given g. We emphasize that this methodology is especially suitable when the number of experiments is small or there exists substantial prior information on the possible ways in which the experiments may cluster together.

The advantage of our analysis lies essentially in its ability to borrow strength from several related experiments without imposing a prespecified dependence structure on the [[Theta].sub.i]'s. For this reason, our procedure appears especially valuable in the study of binary response data with categorical covariates and in the area of Bayesian meta-analysis (see, for example, Morris and Normand 1992).

The method adopted in this article may be seen as the Bayesian counterpart of the frequentist approach leading to multiple shrinkage estimators, pioneered by Efron and Morris (1973) and developed by George (1986). A related line of research has taken place in the field of nonparametric empirical Bayes estimation (see Laird 1978 and Leonard 1984).

The organization of the article is as follows. Section 2 introduces the basic hierarchical model for a given partition g, expressing the prior dependence structure among the [[Theta].sub.i]'s. It then derives the posterior expectation and covariance matrix of [Theta] for a given g in a closed form using an approximation to the beta-binomial likelihood and, finally, computes the posterior distribution of g. Section 3 discusses two proper noninformative priors for [Theta] and presents a detailed analysis of the role played by a specific prior hyperparameter. Finally, Section 4 illustrates the methodology with reference to three sets of real data, showing in particular how classifying factors might help choose the collection of partitions g and assess the sensitivity of the analysis to variations in the prior inputs. It also presents an empirical comparison with alternative methodologies, such as nonparametric and parametric empirical Bayes, standard logistic regression, and a class of combined general Stein estimators.

2. PRIOR TO POSTERIOR ANALYSIS

Let [X.sub.i] given [[Theta].sub.i] be independently distributed as binomial ([n. …

If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.
Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.
Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

Project items include:
• Saved book/article
• Highlights
• Quotes/citations
• Notes
• Bookmarks
Notes

#### Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

#### Cited article

A Bayesian Method for Combining Results from Several Binomial Experiments
Settings

#### Settings

Typeface
Text size Reset View mode
Search within

Look up

#### Look up a word

• Dictionary
• Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

### How to highlight and cite specific passages

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

## Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

## Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.