Twentieth-Century Literature's Andrew J. Kappel Prize in Literary Criticism, 2007

Twentieth Century Literature, Summer 2007 | Go to article overview

Twentieth-Century Literature's Andrew J. Kappel Prize in Literary Criticism, 2007


The winner of this year's prize is Jonathan Greenberg's "Why Can't Biologists Read Poetry? Ian McEwan's Enduring Love. "The judge is Hortense J. Spillers, Gertrude Conaway Vanderbilt Chair in English at Vanderbilt University. Professor Spillers's recent work has appeared in New Centennial Review, boundary 2, and German and Japanese journals, and she is working on a manuscript titled "The Idea of Black Culture," to be published by Blackwell's.

Professor Spillers writes:

  I cannot think of a more daunting task in the powers of discernment
  that I have been called on to exercise lately than trying to select
  the winner of the 2007 Andrew J. Kappel Prize for Twentieth-Century
  Literature. Actually, the assignment has provoked a good deal of
  humility and enough anxiety of judgment in me to last awhile, except
  to say that I am sure that a case could be made for any of the
  nominees. The proof of the latter is that I have changed my mind at
  least once. That's how good they were! But "Why Can't Biologists Read
  Poetry? Ian McEwan's Enduring Love" homes right in on my own literary
  critic's readerly resistance with virtually shocking, laser-like
  precision. To cite one of the closing lines of the argument, literary
  critics can't read science (nor do they always want to) when, like the
  heroine of McEwan's Enduring Love, "they attend solely to an
  instinctual or emotional register and dismiss reflexively the
  legitimacy of science and reason," while the scientists are unable to
  read poetry when "they become triumphant rationalists, refusing to
  acknowledge the origins of their ideas in their interests--economic,
  psychological, or corporeal." I began my reading of this essay with a
  child's attitude toward eating her vegetables, or in consonance with
  the primary figurative path of the essay, not very interested in a
  "happy marriage" between literature and science, but ended up all
  aglow, to my considerable surprise, with the hope "for a rapprochement
  between the disciplines." The essay walked me--almost literally--from
  dismissive reflexion to submissive meditation in the course of a
  couple of dreary late-fall afternoons. In that regard, reading the
  essay was itself a kind of living demonstration of the very argument
  that it was making, as I was delighted to misrecall in the process
  that one of the subliminal "heroes" in the interstices of the piece--
  William Wordsworth--notes in the Preface to the 2nd edition of the
  Lyrical Ballads not exactly what I remember, but close enough in
  intimating that no perdurable chasm opens between poetry and science,
  if "poetry is the breath and finer spirit of all knowledge," as well
  as "the impassioned expression which is in the countenance of all
  Science." Well over a century and a half later, this felicitous
  collision is still news.
    For the reasons that I have delineated, then, I have chosen "Why
  Can't Biologists Read Poetry?" for this year's Kappel Prize. No small
  part of my immense pleasure in reading this writing rests in the
  clarity of its prose and the eloquent persuasive force of its
  arguments. The evidence is steadily marshalled across varying
  conceptual terrains--from narrative theory, textual explication, and
  "close reading" to neo-Darwinist theory in the context of sociobiology
  and evolutionary psychology as well as aspects of philosophical and
  psychoanalytical debate. Rendered harmonious by what I would call an
  interpretive tour de force, these differing and dissonant discourses
  are aimed at offering "less a Darwinian reading of culture than a
  cultural reading of Darwinism" on the disciplinary basis of the
  humanities, especially literary criticism. The essay serves, then, as
  a staging ground of inquiry "into both the new Darwinism and the
  resistance to it" as it poses both the central question that drives
  it, "Why can't biologists read poetry? … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Twentieth-Century Literature's Andrew J. Kappel Prize in Literary Criticism, 2007
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.