Right-Wing Extremism in France-Departmental Differences in the Vote for the National Front

By Stockemer, Daniel; LaMontagne, Bernadette | Romanian Journal of Political Science, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

Right-Wing Extremism in France-Departmental Differences in the Vote for the National Front


Stockemer, Daniel, LaMontagne, Bernadette, Romanian Journal of Political Science


Abstract: Although many studies have addressed the electoral success of right-wing parties and, in particular, the French National Front, no analysis has so far explored departmental differences in the share of votes. This analysis fills this gap by evaluating socio-structural factors and intervening institutional and political variables that have influenced the electoral success of the radical right in the 96 departments of metropolitan France. In this respect, the unemployment rate, crime rate, the degree of urbanization, the electoral system type, the turnout rate as well as the vote share for the moderate right are regressed against the vote share of the National Front. This pooled time series analysis reveals that the degree of urbanization and the turnout rate are the two significant variables accounting for department specific differences in the vote share of the FN.

Keywords: right wing parties, National Front, France, departments, extremism

Introduction

Electoral support for right-wing extremist parties (1) increased in many European countries from the 1980s to the early 2000s allowing these parties to become a significant political force in Western European democracies (Betz 2001: 401). The 2002 contests in France and the Netherlands marked the high point for right-wing extremist support. In the 2002 presidential election in France, electoral support for the National Front candidate, Jean Marie Le Pen contributed to the defeat of Socialist Prime Minister, Lionel Jospin. In the Netherlands, following the 2002 parliamentary elections, the anti-immigrant list Pym Fortuyn became the second largest party in the Dutch Parliament and helped form the governing coalition. Similarly, extreme right-wing parties acquired seats in the Austrian, Belgian, Danish, Italian, Norwegian, and Swiss parliaments.

Although there has been no spectacular victory of any extremist party or candidate following Le Pen's coup in 2002, it is still too early to conclude that extremist right wing parties are on their way out. Recently, support for the radical right has dropped in some countries but not in others. In the Netherlands, following the 2006 national election the list Pym Fortuyn is no longer represented in parliament, and in France, the vote share of the FN has considerably declined in the 2006 presidential (from 16,9% in 2002 to 10,75% in 2007) and parliamentary elections (from 11.3% in 2002 to less than 5% in 2007). Yet, in countries such as Austria, the Freedom Party could consolidate its position. Currently, it occupies 11 percent of the seats in the National Assembly of Austria.

The mixed tendencies in radical right wing support reveals that these extremist parties continue to be a thread to democracy. Extremist parties, such as the French National Front, reject universal and egalitarian values and the principles of representative democracy (Mudde 2000: 12). They believe in a natural, harmonious, organic order (e. g., the nation and the family) that is ethically good. Everything (e. g., globalization and ethnic diversity) that breaks this organic order is seen as ethically reprehensible (Rydgren 2004: 10). This political monism, combined with radical, ethnic nationalism, threatens core democratic values of a pluralistic society. The extremist right, embracing elements of populism or, as some scholars claim, neo-fascism (1), also aims at the repression of differences and dissent and the closing down of the market of ideas (Lipset and Raab 1970: 6). Moreover, populist rhetoric incites ethnic violence, and some of the extremist parties engage, at least partly, in historical revisionism. (2) In view of their platforms (3), the far right could also have serious effects on basic human rights and freedoms. (4)

Academics have extensively analyzed the electoral breakthrough and parliamentary progress of the extreme right through case studies (Mayer and Perrineau 1992, Simmons 1996, Holsteyn, 2003, Rydgren 2004) as well as comparative analyses (Beyme 1988, Betz 1994, Carter 2005, Norris 2005). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Right-Wing Extremism in France-Departmental Differences in the Vote for the National Front
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.