Amendments in No Way Weaken Public Participation and Community Involvement

Cape Times (South Africa), March 27, 2008 | Go to article overview

Amendments in No Way Weaken Public Participation and Community Involvement


BYLINE: Joanne Yawitch

The Federation for Sustainable Environment's (FSE) spokesperson Koos Pretorius ("Bills threaten to draw teeth of EIAs", March 24) provides an interesting, but seriously misguided and factually incorrect, interpretation of the amendments to the National Environmental Management Act (Nema) discussed in the portfolio committee last week.

The amendments proposed for Nema focus on five broad areas, namely: provisions to include tools other than environmental impact assessment (EIA) as regulatory options; provisions to manage environmental impacts through norms and standards; provisions to increase the use and legal standing of strategic spatial tools such as strategic environmental assessments and environmental management frameworks; provisions to improve intra-governmental co-operation and co-ordination; and finally to bring mining into the environmental management regime of Nema.

Before the proposed amendments, although titled integrated environmental management, Chapter 5 of Nema in essence only allowed for regulation of environmental impact management through EIA and did not follow international use by allowing for a wide range of environmental management tools. EIA, although useful for a wide range of activities, is not in all instances the most appropriate tool as it is, in its nature, site specific and pre-development focused.

There are a wide range of tools available that are, in some instances, more appropriate to determine and manage the environmental impacts or environmental management requirements of activities than EIA.

The amendments to Nema, therefore, introduce the ability to develop and regulate tools other than EIA to identify, avoid or manage environmental impacts.

The amendments still allow the minister (or MEC) to identify activities that may not take place before an environmental authorisation has been obtained, but now further allow the minister, in addition or instead of EIA, to stipulate the process (tool) that must be undergone before such authorisation may be obtained or refused.

Because these potential tools differ, the amendment in Nema stipulates in section 24.4(a) minimum requirements that must (there is no "may" as alleged by Pretorius) be incorporated in regulations enabled by the Act, regardless of the tool to be used, and a second set of requirements in section 24.4(b) that "must, where applicable" be adhered to.

There is an onus of proof on the authority regarding the applicability of the requirements in 24.4(b).

Translated into laymen's terms, this means that the minister may identify activities that require environmental authorisation (as he did through the schedules to the EIA regulations of 2006). He must then regulate the process (or tool) to be followed and, in such regulations, give effect to 24.4(a) and 24.4(b) (as he did with the Nema EIA regulations).

The Nema EIA regulations already include all the requirements stipulated in 24.4(a) and 24.4(b) as all these requirements are applicable to EIA as a tool.

It is incorrect and not based on fact to state that the amendments will have the effect that certain requirements currently applicable in the EIA process will no longer be applied to companies and developers. The requirements listed in the article relating to public participation, mitigation measures, reporting on gaps in knowledge, monitoring of impacts, and investigation of alternatives are all applicable to EIA as a tool and are in the current EIA regulations and will remain to be required for activities subjected to EIA. The Act and amendments are enabling and specify what the minister may regulate and are not a menu for applicants to choose from as has been suggested.

The allegations made in terms of environmental management of mining introduced by the amendment bill really came as a surprise to the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Amendments in No Way Weaken Public Participation and Community Involvement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.