Competition versus Consolidation of Order Flow: Common Stock Listing on Dual Domestic Exchanges

By Khan, Walayet A.; Baker, H. Kent et al. | Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Autumn 1995 | Go to article overview

Competition versus Consolidation of Order Flow: Common Stock Listing on Dual Domestic Exchanges


Khan, Walayet A., Baker, H. Kent, Edelman, Richard B., Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics


INTRODUCTION

Firms often list their common stock on a regional exchange before moving to a national exchange because the listing requirements are less stringent. Some firms with stock listed on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) or the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) later have listed dually on one or more regional stock exchanges. Although many researchers have examined the effects of listing on a national exchange, dual domestic listing is largely unexplored.(1)

An exception is a study by Khan, Baker, Kennedy, and Perry (1993). They examine the value impact of dually listed firms on the Pacific and Midwest Stock Exchanges from 1984 to 1988. Although the Khan, Baker, Kennedy, and Perry study finds no significant market reaction on the dual listing day, it reports significantly negative abnormal returns after dual listing. The study examines only 30 trading days in the postlisting period. The study concludes that dual listing has negative valuation implications and that management should question dual listing.

Given its exploratory nature, the Khan, Baker, Kennedy, and Perry study does not consider whether market participants react differently to dual listing based on certain prelisting characteristics such as liquidity. Thus, the negative postlisting market response to dual listing may apply only to a subsample of stocks, not to all dually listed stocks. Their study also does not examine the issue of whether liquidity changes as a result of dual listing by altering the trading structure from a monopoly specialist system of the AMEX and NYSE to a multispecialist system created by dual listing.

The current study extends the recent research on the microstructure of equity markets by analyzing the effects of dual listing on stock returns and liquidity. It also examines whether a postlisting anomaly exists after dual listing. This study is important because little empirical evidence exists about the effects of changing market structure through dual domestic listing. As Hasbrouck (1991, p. 14) notes, "microstructure analysis had not yet arrived at the point where we can assert a priori that a particular market structure will afford the most liquidity for a given security."

Besides being of academic interest, the current study has implications for market regulators. In 1975 the Securities and Exchange Commission and Congress created the National Market System (NMS) in which dually listed stocks trade. NMS was created to increase interdealer and intermarket competition and to enhance transactional efficiency of equity markets. This study provides evidence about whether increasing competition among specialists through dual listing enhances liquidity. Gerety, McMillan, and Mulherin (1991) note that market microstructure has become an important tool in gauging the effect of existing securities regulation.

The findings also should interest corporate managers and investors. Corporate managers, who are considering dually listing their firm's stock, may want to know if this decision affects the financial well-being of their common shareholders. Investors may want to know if dual listing provides an opportunity for achieving abnormal returns.

MARKET MICROSTRUCTURE ISSUES

According to Amihud and Mendelson (1988) and Hasbrouck (1991), many persons believed until recently that market arrangements had little relevance for securities returns. Now the various characteristics and differences among alternative market structures have attracted increasing interest among the academic community. Microstructure studies suggest that managers intent on increasing shareholder wealth should pay attention to the market arrangements by which their stock is traded.

The specialist structure is desirable for less liquid securities because the consolidation of the smaller order flow with one specialist reduces the fixed costs of market-making. Furthermore, the specialist reduces risk exposure by having greater flexibility in adjusting inventory due to absence of competing dealers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Competition versus Consolidation of Order Flow: Common Stock Listing on Dual Domestic Exchanges
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.