Gresham's Law in Nineteenth-Century America

By Greenfield, Robert L.; Rockoff, Hugh | Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, November 1995 | Go to article overview

Gresham's Law in Nineteenth-Century America


Greenfield, Robert L., Rockoff, Hugh, Journal of Money, Credit & Banking


For almost as long as money has been the object of systematic study, Gresham's law--bad money drives out good--has been recognized as one of money's governing principles. Now, however, doubts have arisen concerning the validity of this venerable principle. In their provocative, theoretical reappraisal of Gresham's law, Rolnick and Weber (1986) maintain that bad money and good money will typically circulate together, bad money at its face value and good money at a price exceeding its face value. Bad money, they say, rather than driving good money out, drives it to a premium.

This paper examines the leading cases in nineteenth-century U.S. monetary history, looking for evidence of cocirculation. No such evidence appears. Money circulated by tale, not weight.

1. GRESHAM'S LAW AND ITS RIVAL

What, according to Gresham's law, makes a money "bad"? What enables it to "drive out good money"? A bad coin contains less bullion than does another coin carrying the same denomination. The mint, for example, might begin paying a better price for bullion. Naturally, people will take advantage of an opportunity to have bullion struck as coin more valuable than the bullion itself. Access to the mint thus makes bad money cheap money, too, and its supply grows. Prices rise, including the price of bullion. It becomes more valuable than the heavier coin, which people remove from circulation. Cheapness, not badness per se, then, enables bad money to drive out good.(1)

Gresham's law embodies two distinct propositions: (1) two intrinsically distinct moneys will not both circulate at once, except when, because the quantity of one money is limited, that one remains a subsidiary money, and (2) of the two moneys, only the bad money will circulate. We will mainly concern ourselves with demonstrating that (1) held in nineteenth-century America. Such a demonstration, though it does not itself constitute empirical verification of Gresham's law, suffices to reject its rival.

Gresham's law assumes that a coin circulates, as long as it does, at face value. Rolnick and Weber question this assumption. Despite legal-tender laws, people would supposedly continue using good coin as money, but at its bullion value. Consider a creditor, for example, with a $100 claim. If the debtor offered bad money denominated $100, then its legal-tender status would force the creditor to accept the offer; the creditor could not win a suit for nonpayment. But suppose that the debtor offered good money denominated $95 but, as bullion, worth $100. The legal-tender law would not stop the creditor from accepting the offer, and neither party would have reason to seek legal redress.(2) Rolnick and Weber thus focus on price, not quantity, as the magnitude that adjusts to keep the good coin worth no less as coin than as bullion. They do allow for quantity adjustment, but "only when the costs of using good money at a premium are significant" (pp. 195-96).

What costs are these? When do they become significant? The costs are the costs of rounding, and they become significant when applied to small-denomination coins. A 25 percent premium on a nickel, for example, is 1.25 cents. If people round 1.25 cents to a penny, then in a small transaction, a customer using nickels would lose part of the premium. People would therefore bundle nickels for use in a large transaction or else melt nickels for sale as bullion.

Actually, rounding would not be the main cost of using the good money at a premium. The value of the nonpar coin would fluctuate constantly, forcing people to monitor its value and then negotiate in every transaction.(3) Perhaps today, we can imagine that, at virtually every transaction site, a computer network would make a quotation on the nonpar money available instantaneously and inexpensively. Under nineteenth-century conditions, however, using the nonpar coin would have required negotiating its value despite considerable uncertainty about its value in central markets. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Gresham's Law in Nineteenth-Century America
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.