Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of Investor-State Arbitration through Transparency and Amicus Curiae Participation

By VanDuzer, J. Anthony | McGill Law Journal, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of Investor-State Arbitration through Transparency and Amicus Curiae Participation


VanDuzer, J. Anthony, McGill Law Journal


Investor-state arbitration under NAFTA and the other investment treaties to which Canada is a party has been controversial. There are concerns that investor-state arbitration allows investors to challenge laws of general application intended to achieve important public-policy objectives though a process that is lacking in transparency and democratic accountability. This critique of investor-state arbitration is diminishing in potency, however, as arbitral tribunals have recognized the need for greater openness in promoting the legitimacy of the process and have adopted practices intended to achieve that goal. For example, tribunals have ordered open hearings and permitted amicus curiae participation. While all three NAFTA party states have strongly endorsed these practices, they have failed to amend NAFTA to guarantee them. Developments outside of NAFTA indicate that the move toward transparency is part of a larger trend, the strength of which may indicate that the recent changes in practice will be enduring. However, in the absence of comprehensive and predictable rules, concerns about the legitimacy of the NAFTA process are likely to remain.

L'arbitrage investisseur-Etat dans le cadre de l'ALENA et des autres traites d'investissement dont le Canada est signataire a fait l'objet de maintes controverses. Certains craignent que l'arbitrage investisseur-Etat ne permette aux investisseurs de contester des lois d'application generale, comportant d'importants objectifs de politique publique, par le biais d'un processus qui manque de la transparence democratique. Cette critique perd cependant de sa force depuis que les tribunaux arbitraux ont reconnu la necessite d'une plus grande ouverture en vue de promouvoir la legitimite du processus et qu'ils ont, par consequent, adopte certaines pratiques afin de realiser cet objectif. Par exemple, les tribunaux ont ordonne la tenue de proces publics et ont permis la participation d'amici curiae. Quoique chacun des trois Etats signataires de l'ALENA ait vivement appuye ces pratiques, aucun amendement n'a ete fait pour en assurer leur permanence. Les developpements externes a l'ALENA suggerent que cette ouverture a la transparence s'inscrit dans une tendance plus large, dont l'ampleur pourrait etre indicative de l'endurance probable des changements dans les pratiques. Neanmoins, en l'absence continue de regles exhaustives et previsibles, les preoccupations quant a la legitimite du processus de l'ALENA pour le reglement des differends risquent de persister.

Introduction

  I. Overview of Investor-State Arbitration
     A. A Brief History of Bilateral Investment Treaties
     B. Statistics on Investor-State Claims

 II. The Nature of Legitimacy Concerns Regarding
     NAFTA Chapter 11

III. Rules on Transparency in Investor-State Arbitrations
     A. The NAFTA Rules
        1. Introduction
        2. FTC Interpretive Note on Transparency
        3. NAFTA Practice
        4. Gaps in NAFTA Transparency Rules
           a. Disclosure Prior to Commencement of the
              Arbitration
           b. Disclosure of Arbitration Claire
           c. Disclosure After Commencement of Arbitration
     B. Recent Improvements in Transparency Rules

 IV. Rules on the Participation of Amici Curiae in Investor-State
     Arbitrations
     A. Introduction
     B. NAFTA Practice
     C. Recent Improvements in Amicus Curiae Rules

Conclusions

Introduction

When Canada became a party to the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1992, it adopted investor-state arbitration as part of its foreign investment policy. (1) Investor-state arbitration is provided for in Chapter 11 of NAFTA and in nineteen bilateral foreign investment protection agreements entered into by Canada that follow the NAFTA model. (2) Investor-state arbitration provisions in a treaty permit a private investor from a state that is a party to the treaty to seek compensation for injuries that the investor suffers as a result of measures of another party state that are not consistent with the substantive obligations in the treaty. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of Investor-State Arbitration through Transparency and Amicus Curiae Participation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.