Textualist Statutory Interpretation Kills Section 10(b) "Aiding and Abetting" Liability

By Meetre, Steven A. | Defense Counsel Journal, January 1996 | Go to article overview

Textualist Statutory Interpretation Kills Section 10(b) "Aiding and Abetting" Liability


Meetre, Steven A., Defense Counsel Journal


IN First Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver,(1) the U.S. Supreme Court held that there is no private aiding and abetting liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule lob-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The decision eliminated the judicially implied private right of action by which allegedly defrauded investors could sue securities and accounting professionals--typically accounting firms, brokerages, law firms and banks--who aided and abetted a primary violator--typically a securities issuer or underwriter. A five-justice majority strictly interpreted Section 10(b), focusing on its text and rejecting the dissent's admonition to adhere to the 1934 act's general purpose of investor protection and the principle of stare decisis.

Central Bank has weighty ramifications for securities litigation under Section 10(b) and other provisions of the securities laws, but the decision is also an interesting illustration of the relationship between the textualist and purposivist factions of the Supreme Court when engaged in statutory interpretation. The majority opinion by Justice Kennedy is a vivid example of how the Court has utilized the textualist approach, which began in the 1970s, to narrow the scope of Section 10(b). The dissent by Justice Stevens is notable for its employment of both purposivist and dynamic theories of statutory interpretation when the precedents for strict interpretation were numerous.

Central Bank is a legally provocative decision, not only for the field of securities law but also for students and critics of the modem Supreme Court and the relationship between its conservative and more liberal factions.

SECURITIES ACTS

A. Section 10(b) Implied Private Rights of Action

The primary purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 and the 1934 act were to protect investors and promote market stability and efficiency.(2) The statutes attempt to ensure full disclosure in securities transactions, to empower the SEC to bring civil and criminal actions against violators of the acts, and to provide investors with private remedies when defrauded in the securities markets.(3) However, Section 10(b) of the 1934 act, 15 U.S.C. [sections] 78j(b), does not expressly provide for a private remedy against primary violators or against aiders and abettors, and the legislative history does not indicate that Congress contemplated a private remedy. Section 10(b) is an enabling statute that grants the SEC authority to promulgate rules.

Labeled "Manipulative and Deceptive Devices," it provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or

indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality

of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of

any facility of any national securities exchange--...

(b) To use or employ, in connection with the

purchase or sale of any security registered on a

national securities exchange or any security not so

registered, any manipulative or deceptive device

or contrivance in contravention of such rules and

regulations as the [Securities Exchange] Commission

may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in

the public interest or for the protection of investors.

Based on that authority, in 1942 the SEC promulgated Rule 10b-5, its "catch-all" anti-fraud provision:

It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or

indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality

of interstate commerce, or of the mails

or of any facility of any national securities exchange,

(a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice

to defraud,

(b) To make any untrue statement of a material

fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in

order to make the statements made, in the light of

the circumstances under which they were made,

not misleading, or

(c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of

business which operates or would operate as fraud

or deceit upon any person,

in connection with the purchase or sale of any

security. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Textualist Statutory Interpretation Kills Section 10(b) "Aiding and Abetting" Liability
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.