Introduction

By Compagnon, Antoine | The Romanic Review, May 1995 | Go to article overview

Introduction


Compagnon, Antoine, The Romanic Review


INTRODUCTION

Developed during the 1970s, and yet indebted to the philological tradition, genetic criticism has become a major field of literary studies in France. Based on the reading of manuscripts and all documents related to the genesis of a text, its focus is less the text and its edition than the dynamic process of writing and textual production. An original relation to literature follows: instead of being viewed statically, literature is understood as always in movement, implying all the possibilities sketched out in its writing. Genetic criticism has renewed literary studies in positing that the manuscript is as relevant as the text. Recent critical editions of Flaubert, Zola, Proust, Valery, and Sartre have exemplified this approach.

These are the proceedings of a conference that was held at Columbia University in 1994(1). We wanted to examine the part manuscripts can and should play in the understanding of literary texts. However, the paradigms that regulate literary research on manuscripts in France and North America remain thoroughly dissimilar. In the United States and Canada, genetic criticism has met with increasing interest, and some scholars use its theories and methods, but no group has yet claimed an affiliation with it. The purpose of the symposium was therefore for specialists of genetic criticism to meet with North American experts on textual criticism to discuss their theoretical premises, their methods, and their achievements to date.

The participants represented a broad spectrum of opinions on this crucial scholarly concern from both sides of the Atlantic. However, while most French scholars were familiar with genetic criticism but less conversant with textual criticism, most American speakers were trained in textual criticism exclusively. As the misunderstanding might be comparable with readers of this special issue of the Romanic Review, it remains critical, in this cursory introduction, to describe the basics of genetic criticism for American-trained readers--therefore, in English--and brief French-trained readers on textual criticism--conversely, in French.

What is genetic criticism, or textual genetics, as it is also sometimes called? These terms have no currency in English. To begin simply, let us say that it is a French way, or the French way--dominant today--of interpreting--and on occasion editing--manuscripts, variant readings, and in general all evidence related to the "genesis" of modern literary texts. It claims to be criticism, because it gives primacy to interpretation over editing, and genetic, because its ultimate goal is to reconstruct, by examining notebooks, autographs, typescripts and proofs, the mechanisms of textual production through the movement of writing-what Louis Hay called the "third dimension" of the text--and to elucidate the stages of the creative process, its genesis. Obviously, both goals can be challenged.

There are many corollaries to this question on the nature and goals of genetic criticism. For instance: Is it a new paradigm in literary criticism? That is, can it be defined by a new object--manuscripts--and method--manuscriptology, scriptology, or (this being the appellation I would prefer if it were not already taken) grammatology--? Or is it a return to old philology under a new guise? Is there a rupture or a continuity between genetic criticism and, for instance, "critique de genese," as the two notorious Gustaves, Gustave Lanson and Gustave Rudler, called it in the early Twentieth Century? Is there rupture or continuity with literary history, and with structuralism? Is it criticism, that is, is it truly analyzing literature as literature, and not as historical documents or linguistic utterances? Or, to go straight to the most radical question, is genetic criticism not primarily and effectively the institutional definition and legitimation of a research group at the CNRS? The question is all the more relevant because genetic criticism has been highly successful institutionally in France. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Introduction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.