Responding to a Real Need: Liberalizing Mexico City's Abortion Law

By Mejia, Maria Consuelo; Sanchez, Maria Luisa | Conscience, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

Responding to a Real Need: Liberalizing Mexico City's Abortion Law


Mejia, Maria Consuelo, Sanchez, Maria Luisa, Conscience


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

ALTHOUGH IN THE LAST decade there has been an international trend toward liberalizing abortion policy, in Latin America complex differences continue to exist between countries in the region. Since 2006, abortion has been permitted in Colombia when a woman's health is at risk, in the case of rape or incest and severe fetal impairment, whereas previously it had been prohibited without exception. During the same year, the Nicaraguan Congress left women to the "will of God" by banning abortion, even to save a woman's life. More recently in Mexico, in the midst of the most intense, wide-reaching public debate on abortion in its history, Mexico City's legislature voted to decriminalize abortion during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

The landmark reform was approved on April 24, 2007, by a two-thirds majority of the legislature, with support from five political parties. It not only decriminalizes abortion during the first trimester, but also reduced punishment for women who procure an abortion after this period. This inclusive bill also requires the Mexico City Ministry of Health (MOH) to provide legal abortion services, free of charge, to any woman who lives in Mexico City, even if she is covered by other public or private insurance, and at a moderate rate for women from other states of the country and foreigners. Moreover, this reform also guarantees sexuality education and campaigns on reproductive and sexual rights, the availability of contraceptive methods, and counseling for all women considering an abortion. These changes put Mexico City at the forefront of abortion liberalization in Latin America and the Caribbean, on par only with Cuba, Guyana and Puerto Rico, and represent a comprehensive approach to preventing unwanted pregnancies, while at the same time respecting women's right to decide.

CONTEXT AND STRATEGIES

The reform in Mexico City resulted from a combination of social and political factors that aligned at the right time and in the right place: a dominant, left-wing party in the Mexico City Legislature in an environment of political polarization between the left and right wing, an international human rights framework in favor of abortion rights and, above all, more than 35 years of consistent struggle by the feminist movement, the women's movement and allied civil society organizations to put abortion rights on the public agenda. Over the years, a broad range of perspectives on public health, bioethics, philosophy, human rights, social justice, and secular and Catholic prochoice arguments were developed in support of safe and legal abortion. Such diverse arguments helped prochoice advocates educate the public, the media, legislators, the health sector and the judicial branch about the complexity of the issue.

A gradual approach to harmonize abortion indications throughout the country was also critical. The recent reform cannot be explained without taking into account the reforms to the Mexico City Penal Code in 2000 and 2003, which incorporated other indications for legal abortion and regulated conscientious objection for the very first time in Mexico. (The 2000 and 2003 reforms decriminalized abortion when pregnancy threatens a woman's health, in the case of severe fetal malformation and nonconsensual artificial insemination. Prior to these reforms, accidental abortion, which refers to any unintended action that results in miscarriage, and abortion when pregnancy is a result of rape were not considered punishable offenses.) These changes had already put Mexico City at the vanguard of reproductive rights in Mexico at large.

The case of Paulina, a 13-year-old girl who was raped, became pregnant, was denied a legal abortion by public authorities and forced to carry her pregnancy to term was also important in this process. Paulina's case helped establish abortion rights as human rights when the Mexican state, in recognition that her rights had been violated, signed an agreement between her legal representatives, the Mexican state, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Responding to a Real Need: Liberalizing Mexico City's Abortion Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.