What's Sex Got to Do with It? Race, Power, Citizenship, and "Intermediate Identities" in the Post-Emancipation United States

By Holder, Ann S. | The Journal of African American History, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

What's Sex Got to Do with It? Race, Power, Citizenship, and "Intermediate Identities" in the Post-Emancipation United States


Holder, Ann S., The Journal of African American History


In the past two decades, U.S. audiences have been recipients of numerous popular accounts that seem to show the role of sexuality in destabilizing or confounding expectations of racial difference. For every highly public case, from Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings to revelations about South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, there have been scores of memoirs or loosely fictionalized tales of common everyday folks whose lives were reshaped or upended by instances of interracial sexuality, mixed identity, or rediscovered interracial family heritage. (1) Even historians have gotten into the act, combing the archives for long-buried details of public or private scandals. (2) While these stories suggest that our contemporary propensity to "see race" runs counter to the historical evidence, they also in effect repackage common knowledge from earlier periods as expose or revelation. Missing, in most of these accounts, are the ways stories of racial uncertainty actually challenge the stratified political and cultural order that characterized the United States at the turn of the 20th century. Missing, in other words, are the historical vicissitudes of citizenship and its exclusions, as shaped by interlocking histories of race and sex.

This essay examines the post-emancipation United States, a moment of stark conflict between the commonly acknowledged history of interracial sex and new efforts to establish a fiction of racial difference. The stakes for the outcome of post-Civil War citizenship were high. (3) For almost 250 years of slavery, racial difference was driven and determined primarily by status, rather than visible distinction or legal definition. There were vested interests in keeping race vague in the service of reproducing the slave regime. Emancipation and the 13th Amendment overturned distinctions of "condition," and the political expansiveness of the Reconstruction Amendments launched a pitched battle between advocates of full, non-racial citizenship and those who sought to recreate slavery's color line by denying citizenship rights on racial grounds.

New legal definitions of race, in connection with the regulation of reproductive sexuality, were key elements, not just sideline issues, in efforts to undermine the postwar politics of non-racial citizenship. For southern white traditionalists, laws that carved out a sphere of racial distinction were the best hope of maintaining the social and political divisions that slavery could no longer enforce. Racial certainty had to be forged from a landscape of indeterminacy, and the immediate postwar emphasis on preventing "miscegenation" and/or interracial marriage played a pivotal role in that project.

On the other side of the debate, activists and intellectuals committed to non-racial citizenship countered by asserting the long history of interracial sex, most poignantly the history of coerced sexual exploitation under the slave regime. Dramatizing the impossibility of racial purity, they resisted efforts to write into law social or civil distinctions based on race. The special difficulty they faced was to transcend racial categories on behalf of citizenship rights, while at the same time building a constituency that was willing and prepared to challenge political assaults and acts of terror that were highly racialized.

Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Anna Julia Cooper, and T. Thomas Fortune were among the best-known commentators on these topics, but they also represented a deep, broad-based, and multifaceted repository of common knowledge about interracial sex and intermediate racial identities that helped fuel political demands for non-racial citizenship. Indeed, some of the most profound contributions came from those whose names are less well-known, such as Richmond's John Mitchell, Jr., who demonstrate the extent to which the analysis that Douglass, Wells, Mitchell, and others publicized was based on knowledge with profound historical roots among the formerly enslaved, free people of color, white abolitionists, and anti-slavery radicals. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

What's Sex Got to Do with It? Race, Power, Citizenship, and "Intermediate Identities" in the Post-Emancipation United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.