Do Practitioners Have a Duty to Predict Retroactive Tax Legislation?

By Switzer, Ralph V.; Quiring, Diane E. | The National Public Accountant, April 1996 | Go to article overview

Do Practitioners Have a Duty to Predict Retroactive Tax Legislation?


Switzer, Ralph V., Quiring, Diane E., The National Public Accountant


"Tax legislation is not a promise, and a taxpayer has no vested right in the Internal Revenue Code."

On June 13, 1994, U.S. v. Carlton, _____ U.S. _____ (1994), 62 U.S.L.W 4472, 1994 U.S. Lexis 4449, one of the year's most closely-watched tax cases, was handed down by the United States Supreme Court. At issue was a 1987 congressional amendment retroactively limiting the availability of an estate tax deduction for sales of employer securities to employee stock ownership plans. The case received intense scrutiny because of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (1993 Tax Compromise) enacted in August 1993, which raised estate and income taxes retroactively back to January 1, 1993. The passage of the 1993 Tax Compromise renewed the public outrage and the interminable debate surrounding the constitutionality of retroactive taxes.

Congress has passed 14 laws that included retroactive tax increases since 1917, including the 1993 Tax Compromise. The U.S. Supreme Court has been surprisingly receptive to the retroactive applications of tax statutes, citing various rationales to justify its positions.

Historical Roots of Retroactive

Legislation

"Retroactive" Defined

Generally, retroactive means to make something effective as of a date prior to enactment. Specifically applicable to legislation, "...retroactive laws apply to prior acts, events, or occurrences, and seek to impose new consequences on such past conduct." (Weiler, 1993). Retroactive statutes, then, are valid for a period of time before the laws' effective enactment dates.

Ex Post Facto Clauses of the

United States Constitution

Retroactive laws are not expressly prohibited by the United States Constitution, although ex post facto literally means "after the fact." For example, Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states that "[n]o ... ex post facto Law shall be passed." Likewise, Article I, Section 10 declares that "[n]o State shall...pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or law impairing the Obligation of Contracts."

Criminal Statutes

A case in the late 18th century narrowed the constitution's express prohibition against ex post facto laws. In Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386 (1798), the U.S. Supreme Court held that prohibitions against ex post facto laws applied only to criminal laws. Although the validity of this view is continually questioned,(1) the United States Supreme Court has continued to limit the ex post facto clauses to criminal statutes.

Due Process issues

The validity of retroactive statutes has been tested by the U.S. Supreme Court not by utilizing the ex post facto clauses of the Constitution, but under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment which provides that "[n]o person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Procedural due process requires that any decision by the government to take life, liberty or property must be made fairly; thus, procedural due process is a right that requires notice and the opportunity to be heard before rights or properties are taken away from an individual or business.

Substantive due process is a right to have laws that do not deprive individuals or businesses of property or other rights without justification or reason. Generally, a law that is incompatible with the Constitution violates substantive due process. "If a law or other governmental action limits a fundamental right, it will be held to violate substantive due process unless it promotes a compelling or overriding interest. A law or action does not violate substantive due process if it rationally relates to any legitimate governmental end." (Clarkson, et. al. 1992)

Judicial History of Retroactive

Applications of Taxes

"Arbitrary and irrational" Standard

One must distinguish between retroactive tax and non-tax legislation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Do Practitioners Have a Duty to Predict Retroactive Tax Legislation?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.