Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian and Global Systems-Based Innovation Ecologies

By Bouchard, Ron A. | Health Law Journal, Annual 2007 | Go to article overview

Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian and Global Systems-Based Innovation Ecologies


Bouchard, Ron A., Health Law Journal


I say unto you: one must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. I say unto you: you still have chaos in yourselves.

Zarathustra

I. Introduction

In the companion article, (1) the impact of the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in KSR v. Teleflex (KSR) (2) on the Canadian intellectual property and regulatory (IPR) rights landscape was discussed in relation to the current medical research enterprise. (3) A number of claims were made as to why patent jurisprudence handed down by SCOTUS is important for scholars of Canadian health law and policy, including (1) economic and trade considerations for Canadian inventors and firms; (2) issues revolving around the importance of IPR rights to a system of state-sponsored public health, including determination of the availability, price, and safety and efficacy of medical products, as well as the distribution of the tangible and non-tangible benefits of commercializing medical research among various public and private actors responsible for generating, capitalizing and marketing the products of that research; and (3) the importance of institutional structures underpinning IPR rights afforded to medical inventions from a global perspective. This article discusses a fourth set of reasons, namely that decisions by a global patent court of prominence such as SCOTUS have the potential to significantly affect the rate and direction of innovative activity of Canadian inventors and firms through the continually evolving nature of the relationship between large-scale IPR rights, national science and technology (S&T) policies meant to stimulate innovation, and the inherently spontaneous emergent characteristics of innovation (4) and those responsible for it in IPR rights-intensive sectors.

Large scale S&T-based legal and regulatory regimes are crucial for inventors and firms working within innovation-intensive industries. (5) This is particularly true in relation to domestic policies having as their objective enhancement of national competitiveness and productivity via commercialization of publicly funded research, (6) which often single out biomedical and life sciences sectors as fertile policy targets. (7) Indeed, it has been suggested that commercialization-based S&T policies, legislation and initiatives provided both the foundation and fuel for the global biotechnology revolution. (8) Therefore, to the extent that Canadian domestic IPR rights are out of line with IPR rights on a more global scale, they have the potential to harm local inventors and corporations seeking to market innovative products globally. (9) As such, Canadian inventors do not operate within purely a local or narrow sphere, but rather are embedded within a complex global network of scientific, medical, legal, regulatory, economic, political and other social actors that--combined--act to produce, construct and use the products of scientific advances, (10) including those within the medical sciences rubric. (11) It is for this reason that creative acts underpinning innovation are increasingly being viewed as emanating from a complex "innovation ecology."

As discussed in more detail below, the conceptual framework of an innovation ecology is encompassed and informed by the broader systems theory framework. (12) Wulf recently defined an innovation ecology as the various "interrelated institutions, laws, regulations and policies" necessary to underwrite successful commercialization of publicly funded research through an "infrastructure that entails education, research, tax policy, and intellectual property protection, among others." (13) As such, IPR rights form the linchpin between innovative medical research and the marketing and consumption of approved medical products. Casting the innovation landscape as a complex organic ecology rather than the historical linear model of basic-to-applied research is wholly consistent with newer conceptual and analytical models such as complex adaptive systems, (14) network dynamics (15) and systems dynamics, (16) which view and model systems as a dynamic, adaptive and indeterminate network of nodes where the behavior of the system as a whole is governed by the ever-changing and non-linear nature of the connections between actors and institutions rather than as a predictable sum of a set of linear deterministic nodes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Upgrade your membership to receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad‑free environment

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian and Global Systems-Based Innovation Ecologies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved in your active project from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.