Unemployment Surprise

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), September 9, 2008 | Go to article overview

Unemployment Surprise


Byline: Alfred Tella, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The spike in the unemployment rate from 5.7 percent in July to a five-year high of 6.1 percent in August left forecasters with egg on their faces. No change or a slight uptick had been expected.

Even with the 84,000 August drop in nonfarm payroll jobs, the eighth monthly job decline in a row, last month's jump in unemployment was out of proportion to the weakness in employment. There are lags and catch-ups in economic data, so one month doesn't tell the story. A closer look shows the employment-unemployment relationship has been out of historical whack all year. Insofar as economic forecasters are empiricists who rely on past behavior for guidance, recent underestimates of joblessness are understandable.

Since the beginning of the year, employer-reported payroll jobs have dropped by more than a half million while unemployment has risen by a surprising 1.8 million. Total employment, as measured by household survey, is down by 771,000.

In the past, when the job market has deteriorated, labor force participation has also declined. Some people who lost their jobs saw no point continuing a futile search and some who would have liked to enter the work force postponed doing so until prospects improved. Since government statistics count as unemployed only jobless people looking for work, the decline in labor force participation dampened the rise in the unemployment rate.

What's unusual about this downturn is the larger number of people who are either starting or persisting in a job search despite the dimmer prospects of finding work. They have pushed up the unemployment rate to above normal levels relative to total job losses.

Given the drop this year in the percentage of the working-age population employed, the labor force participation rate (the proportion of the population in the work force) would have been expected to decline from 66.1 percent in January to 65.8 percent in August, based on previous experience. But the participation rate hasn't declined - it was 66.1 percent last month. That means 800,000 more people are in the labor force and unemployed than past relationships in the data would have predicted.

The unemployment rate under more normal circumstances would have been 5.6 percent last month instead of 6.1 percent as reported - a big difference with political implications. The estimated gap between rates was smaller in July, 0.3, as previously reported on this page. If rising unemployment gets further out of synch with employment, it could raise new questions about the meaning of the unemployment data. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Unemployment Surprise
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.