A Comparison of the Earnings Capitalization and the Excess Earnings Models in the Valuation of Closely-Held Businesses

By Mastracchio, Nicholas J.; Lippitt, Jeffrey W. | Journal of Small Business Management, January 1996 | Go to article overview

A Comparison of the Earnings Capitalization and the Excess Earnings Models in the Valuation of Closely-Held Businesses


Mastracchio, Nicholas J., Lippitt, Jeffrey W., Journal of Small Business Management


Closely-held businesses are valued for many tax, legal, and business reasons. Recent growth in the use of employee retirement plans that invest in the common stock of the sponsoring closely-held company (Employee Stock Ownership Plans(1)) has resulted in the need for annual valuations of these companies for compliance with U.S. tax and pension regulations (Pratt 1993). These plans require annual valuations to determine the market value of the stock donated to the plan and to determine the price to be paid to retiring employees. Litigation is another reason for valuations. Many jurisdictions have adopted equitable distribution laws requiring businesses that are owned by one spouse to be treated as marital property and valued in connection with divorce actions. This is an important and growing cause for valuations (Pratt 1993). Legislation and case law protecting minority interest shareholders require corporations to repurchase shares of oppressed minority shareholders at an appraised fair value. Currently, all states in the U.S. except for West Virginia provide this type of relief to minority shareholders (Pratt 1993). These requirements, in addition to continuing needs in the areas of financial planning, estate and gift taxation, and actual transfers of ownership, have resulted in a large and growing demand for the valuation of closely-held businesses.

There is a variety of models available for valuing small businesses. In choosing the appropriate models in any particular situation, an appraiser must make judgments regarding which models will most accurately predict market value. Little empirical guidance is available in the literature to assist in this judgment. This paper presents the results of an empirical test comparing two of the most commonly used models - the earnings capitalization model and the excess earnings model. (In addition to these models, there are the discounted cash flows model, models based on assets such as net asset value and liquidation value, and models that consider comparable sales of the same or similar companies(2).) The second section of this paper discusses the underlying concepts of two of the most widely used valuation models. The third section describes previous empirical work. The fourth section describes the test used to compare the applicability of the excess earnings model to the earnings capitalization model, and the final section summarizes the results and conclusions reached.

UNDERLYING CONCEPTS

The objective of a valuation of a business is to estimate its fair market value, that is, "the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and willing seller when the former is not under any compulsion to buy and the latter is not under any compulsion to sell, both parties having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts" (IRS Revenue Ruling, 59-60). For publicly-traded companies, the fair market value is demonstrated in market transactions. However, since there is no market for closely-held companies, some other method of estimating the value is necessary. Two commonly used models for valuing small businesses are those based upon the present value of future benefits. Three other models often considered by appraisers are discounted cash flows, earnings capitalization, and excess earnings.

Small business literature provides strong theoretical support for the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model (Carland and White 1980; Lloyd and Hand 1982; Burns and Walker 1991). However, the DCF model has only limited usage in practice. Carland and White suggest that the infrequent use of the DCF model is due to its complexity. Pratt (1993) argues that its infrequent use is due to the difficulty in estimating future cash flows. Lippitt and Mastracchio (1993) examine the relationship between DCF and Earnings Capitalization (EC) and demonstrate that in many situations the models result in similar values if the treatment of capital assets under the EC model is modified using estimates that are readily available from within the historical cost accounting system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparison of the Earnings Capitalization and the Excess Earnings Models in the Valuation of Closely-Held Businesses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.