Literature as Lyrical Politics

By Dimrock, Peter | The Review of Contemporary Fiction, Spring 1996 | Go to article overview

Literature as Lyrical Politics


Dimrock, Peter, The Review of Contemporary Fiction


I think we should never write out anything which we do not intend to commit to memory.

- Quintilian

"We are in one of those moments," a publishing colleague said to me recently, "when nobody knows what is happening." We were talking, as everybody in publishing now must in any conversation lasting more than a few minutes, of the impact of the new media on books and on consciousness. His words came as a relief because they voiced an image that confirmed my uneasy sense that all our talk on this subject had a strangely desperate quality - as if we knew something momentous was happening, but had lost the ability to name what it was we really wanted to talk about, much less decide what we wanted to do.

The comment implied that the technologies mediating our discourse were outstripping our discourse's ability to define those changes or formulate satisfactorily the terms with which to consider and debate their implications. In fact, his comment raises the not unreasonable suggestion that the discourses through which the "selves" and the "we" of our social and cultural interchanges are constituted have come under such intense and transformative pressures in recent years that, temporarily at least, a knowable context for discourse has become impossible.

In this destabilized and destabilizing atmosphere of publishing, I want to make the following straightforward argument: we need to reconnect publishing to the word public that is buried within it and to the "live," speaking (or singing) human voice through which any "public" or "people" is constituted according to our literary tradition's founding rhetorical assertion and assumption. That is, I want us to go back and take rhetoric as an organizing system of order, coherence, and community very seriously indeed. (I have come to this formulation and offer this suggestion, for whatever it is worth, as a result of having worked with Barry Sanders as his editor for A Is for Ox: Violence, Electronic Media, and the Silencing of the Written Word, published in 1994.)

Such an argument is necessary, first, I think, because it offers a method for specifying the social and cognitive terms in which unlimited access to unlimited amounts of information promised by the new technologies is not equivalent to rhetorical competence. Secondly, this argument is necessary because it offers a way to specify what distinguishes markets for information and entertainment - no matter how responsive, sophisticated, and efficient - from interpretive or "textual" communities. Thirdly, the prospective of the embodied speaking voice, as well as "the public" implied by the circulation of the printed word, is necessary because it can provide a way of specifying how writing and reading matter in the context of the changed human sensorium the new technologies imply and are bringing into being. Finally, such an argument offers a way of framing a sense of literature as a "lyrical politics" in which our discussions can be grounded simultaneously in the individual "citizen-self" as an embodied, spontaneous speaker and the contemporary commerce of symbolic interchange.

I feel some entitlement to speak on these matters because as an acquiring editor it is my business to imagine the contemporary transaction between readers and writers. And because I am an interested party. I am judged, after all, on my successes and failures as a broker of words, and I do have some say in how words are bound, commodified, marketed, and sold. My job no doubt accounts for my being struck increasingly by the thought that publishing now finds itself accountable to two contradictory systems of agency: the rhetorical - that is, that tradition and organization of linguistic resources directed toward action through the arts of verbal persuasion - and the cybernetic - that is, that recent ability through "the application of statistical mechanics to communication engineering" "to replace" "human control functions" through "mechanical and electronic systems" and thereby to organize, determine, and administer the commerce of symbolic interchange according to an instrumental logic not founded by language or rhetoric. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Literature as Lyrical Politics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.