Q: Did Clinton Deliver on His Promise to End Welfare as We Know It?

By Dickson, David; Tanner, Michael | Insight on the News, September 2, 1996 | Go to article overview

Q: Did Clinton Deliver on His Promise to End Welfare as We Know It?


Dickson, David, Tanner, Michael, Insight on the News


Yes: Welfare no longer is an entitlement, and work is on the horizon for many recipients.

With considerable prodding from the Republican Congress, President Clinton announced at the end of July that he finally would fulfill a 1992 campaign promise: "to end welfare as we know it." Shortly after the president declared that he would sign the historic welfare-reform legislation that emerged from a House-Senate conference committee, both chambers passed the measure--328-101 in the House, where half of the Democratic caucus supported it; and 78-21 in the Senate, with 25 of 46 Democrats in support, including 86 percent of those seeking reelection this year.

Not only does this bipartisan achievement represent a political victory for the Democratic president and the Republican Congress, it will offer a better life for the millions of welfare recipients whose long-term dependency upon the federal government has denied them the opportunity to support themselves and their families in the most opportunity-laden society civilization has ever created (See Insight, Aug. 26, 1996).

In another historic achievement, the legislation accomplishes the first-ever repeal of a major federal entitlement. It eliminates the federal cash-welfare program Aid to Families With Dependent Children, or AFDC, and replaces it with lump-sum, block-grant payments to the states, where work-related antipoverty programs will be established with far less federal micromanagement. Poverty-reducing experiments will proliferate at the state level, including the comprehensive Wisconsin welfare-reform program for which Gov. Tommy Thompson had been beseeching the Clinton administration for a federal "waiver."

The work component of this reform legislation is strict. Within two years of receiving benefits, for example, the head of every welfare family must begin working--with the exception that states could exempt the parent of a child under I year old. States would be authorized to require adults to perform community service after two months of receiving welfare. The bill will achieve savings in the fraud-ridden food-stamp program, too; able-bodied, childless adults who are not working may receive them for only three months in any three-year period. (If their need for food stamps results from being laid off, they can qualify for another three months.)

By 1997 states will be required to have 25 percent of their welfare recipients working. By 2002, the requirement increases to 50 percent. The legislation requires single parents to work 20 hours per week in 1996 and 30 hours by 2000. The work requirement for two-parent welfare families would be 35 hours per week. States that fail to meet these standards would be penalized by having their block grants reduced by 5 percent the first year. The penalty would increase by 2 percent for each subsequent year a state fails to comply.

These work provisions hardly are onerous. Indeed, nearly 60 percent of mothers in two-parent families with children I year old or younger were in the labor force in 1994--double the rate that prevailed 20 years earlier. And more than three out of four two-parent-family mothers with children age 6 to 13 were in the labor force in 1994. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate for single mothers is more than four times as high as the rate for married mothers. With the percentage of women in the labor force having increased from about one-third in 1960 to nearly two-thirds today--reflecting one of the most profound social transformations of the postwar period--is it any wonder why the taxpaying public has demanded a strong work component in any welfare-reform proposal?

Nor should the work requirement be seen as punitive. Wisconsin Works, or W-2, as Thompson likes to call his state-initiated welfare proposal, is precisely the sort of reform man that the average voter easily can understand. Just how "revolutionary" the Wisconsin plan is can be gleaned from Thompson's description of it. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Q: Did Clinton Deliver on His Promise to End Welfare as We Know It?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.