The Right's Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Antiabortion Argument

By Siegel, Reva B. | Duke Law Journal, April 2008 | Go to article overview

The Right's Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Antiabortion Argument


Siegel, Reva B., Duke Law Journal


INTRODUCTION

In Gonzales v. Carhart, (1) the Supreme Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, (2) emphasizing that government may regulate the methods employed to perform an abortion "to show its profound respect for the life within the woman" (3) and to vindicate the interest in protecting potential life first recognized in Roe v. Wade: Carhart discussed an additional justification for restricting abortion--to protect women as well as the unborn:

   Whether to have an abortion requires a difficult and painful moral
   decision. Casey, supra, at 852-853 (opinion of the Court). While we
   find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems
   unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their
   choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained.
   See Brief for Sandra Cano et al. as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380,
   pp.  22-24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can
   follow. See ibid.

   ... The State has an interest in ensuring so grave a choice is well
   informed. It is self-evident that a mother who comes to regret her
   choice to abort must struggle with grief more anguished and sorrow
   more profound when she learns, only after the event, what she once
   did not know: that she allowed a doctor to pierce the skull and
   vacuum the fast-developing brain of her unborn child, a child
   assuming the human form. (5)

The only support for these assertions the opinion provided was an amicus brief from the conservative law center The Justice Foundation that quoted affidavits gathered by Operation Outcry from women who claimed to have been coerced into and harmed by abortion. (6)

Carhart's woman-protective rationale for restricting abortion is scarcely considered in the Court's cases, (7) and was not discussed by Congress in enacting the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. (8) But the claim that women need protection from abortion has been spreading within the antiabortion movement for decades and played a central role in arguments for the abortion ban that was enacted in South Dakota in 2006. (9) In the week before South Dakota's referendum, the New York Times offered this account of the debate over the abortion ban:

   [T]he most extreme arguments are nowhere to be found. No bloody
   fetuses fill billboards, no absolute claims are being offered about
   women's rights. Instead.... It]he supporters of the ban ... speak
   in gentle tones about how abortion hurts women. "I refuse to show
   pictures of dead babies," said Leslee Unruh, who leads Vote Yes
   For Life, the group that is campaigning for the law, reflecting on
   methods used by anti-abortion groups. "That's what the old way
   was, and that's why they were losing all these years." (10)

In fact, the South Dakota Task Force to Study Abortion, which recommended that the state ban abortion in 2005, heavily relied on the same Operation Outcry affidavits that Justice Kennedy cited in Carhart. (11) The Operation Outcry affidavits were first gathered by the antiabortion movement for a lawsuit on behalf of the original plaintiffs in Roe (Norma McCorvey) (12) and Doe (Sandra Cano) (13) seeking to introduce new evidence of abortion's harm to women as grounds for reopening their cases (14)--a "history-making effort to overturn Roe v. Wade" (15) in which an architect of South Dakota's abortion restrictions (16) played a leading role. The Operation Outcry affidavits were then introduced in South Dakota (17) and the Supreme Court, (18) and have since been entered into state legislative hearings in a number of other states as well. (19) The Outcry affidavits express the new rallying cry of the antiabortion movement. Claims that abortion hurts women and that women are coerced into abortion are now prominently featured on antiabortion websites, (20) and are invoked in support of the abortion ban that will appear on the South Dakota ballot this fall. (21)

Until the Court's decision in Carhart, the rise of gender-based antiabortion arguments was barely noticed in the mainstream press or by scholars outside the public health field. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Right's Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Antiabortion Argument
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.