Yield Burning Scheme Is Just Another Mandate, NLC Says

By Shafroth, Frank | Nation's Cities Weekly, October 28, 1996 | Go to article overview

Yield Burning Scheme Is Just Another Mandate, NLC Says


Shafroth, Frank, Nation's Cities Weekly


"These proposed tax procedures constitute an unfunded federal mandate on state and local taxpayers, a duplicative form of federal regulation, and a threat to local taxpayers," NLC said in urging the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service to withdraw their proposed "yield burning" revenue procedure in comments filed on behalf of the nation's cities last week. NLC submitted the comments to the Treasury and IRS in opposition to proposed, retroactive mandates that could force cities and towns to remit up to $1 billion to the IRS for what the IRS believes are overcharges by underwriters involved in upwards of 5,000 bond refinancings by cities and towns that occurred between the years 1991 and 1994.

"Overall we are concerned that the Treasury has issued a proposed rule which causes a significant fiscal impact on municipalities, regardless of whether there has been any violation or not, and whether intentional or not. The proposal provides no information about the potential compliance costs on state and local taxpayers as provided for under the Unfunded Federal Mandates Reform Act of 1995. The proposed regulation is targeted at states and municipalities, despite indications from the Service that it is underwriters, not states and local governments, which might have violated provisions of the 1986 Tax Reform Act."

Originally, the IRS proposed that cities would have until July 17, 1997, to reach an agreement with the IRS to recover what "the excess overcharges" from municipal underwriters. Failure to both reach such a voluntary agreement and make the repayment would have subjected cities to interest penalties and, potentially, additional tax penalties.

In response, NLC President Greg Lashutka wrote to U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Greg Lashutka wrote to U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin to request a meeting and to insist upon removing what he termed the "gun at our head approach" proposed by the Clinton Administration. In September, after a meeting with NLC, the IRS agreed to drop the July 17th deadline, but scheduled comments and public hearings on moving ahead with the new mandate.

It its comments, NLC urged that the procedure be dropped, but that short of withdrawing the proposal, any final rules be written in plain English and developed jointly with cities: "Despite targeting the proposed rules to municipal issuers, the rules themselves do not translate into English as normally read and understood by municipal policy makers. We would suggest that if there is a genuine interest in arresting efforts by non-governmental interest to deprive governments of revenue, any proposal emanating from the Treasury should be a product of efforts on behalf of all taxpayers and, if directed towards municipal officials, should be readily understandable. Engaging in the writing of procedures which defy clear understanding and response do little to serve the public interest."

NLC noted that the proposed procedure is retroactive, in effect creating a new set of rules by for actions already taken by municipal issuers in good faith reliance on existing federal laws and regulations. Expressing concern about changing the rules well after the fact, NLC noted that the proposed rules would impose significant new costs, but uncertain benefits: "While the proposal has yielded significant quantities of smoke, there is, as yet, no evidence of fire. Similarly, the very nature nanced issues has created a veritable bazaar of business opportunities for firms to engage in transparent transactions with municipalities to determine, at a price, whether or not a violation might exist, and, if so, what rates they will charge to find there is a potential problem, and, upon such a finding, how they will charge to provide professional assistance in representations before the IRS.

We are concerned about any effort by the Treasury which creates such uncertainty and such potential for abuse - abuse harming not just federal taxpayers, but also state and local taxpayers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Yield Burning Scheme Is Just Another Mandate, NLC Says
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.