Phylogeny vs Reticulation in Prehistory

By Bellwood, Peter | Antiquity, December 1996 | Go to article overview

Phylogeny vs Reticulation in Prehistory

Bellwood, Peter, Antiquity

The debate

We were standing in front of a painting with two white water lilies. I stepped a little closer to the picture and looked at it. It was then that I noticed that the lilies were nothing but blobs and blotches of paint. But when I stepped away again, they turned into real water lilies floating in a pond - magic?

BJORK & ANDERSON 1987: 14-15

It takes only a limited perusal of the ethnographic record to make the observation that human languages, cultures and gene pools do not co-vary in absolute unison. Politically-motivated attempts to make them co-vary, as we see in current arenas of ethnic conflict, always end in tragedy and disaster. Despite this, it is also apparent that cases of relatively strong co-variation have occurred in some instances in the past human pattern. A number of geneticists have recently presented evidence which they believe indicates a relatively close relationship between language families and genetic geography on a world scale (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1988; 1994; Ruiz-Linares et al. 1995; Chen et al. 1995). Despite criticism, on grounds which vary from technical through theoretical to purely ethical (e.g. Bateman et al. 1990; Nei & Choudhury 1993; Moore 1995; Pluciennik 1996), the underlying logic of some degree of correlation between large-scale linguistic and genetic entities cannot easily be overturned.

This paper, not dealing with genetic data per se, focuses on an allied perspective from archaeology and linguistics. This perspective should clarify aspects of historical trajectory essential for any balanced consideration of such large-scale issues of correlation. It involves the respective roles of reticulation and phylogeny in the generation of cultural and linguistic patterns of variation. Reticulate models, as recently presented by anthropologists and archaeologists, stress the importance of continuing processes of interaction between contemporary communities. Phylogenetic models, stressing commonality of descent, imply dispersal by culturally and linguistically related populations from common origins in circumscribed homeland regions. The intention of this paper is to counter the growing tendency in the archaeological and anthropological literature to see only reticulate models as representing cultural reality, with phylogeny as a red herring in human cultural affairs (e.g. Terrell 1988; Rowlands 1994; Moore 1994a; 1994b). Both are necessary: reticulate models, if applied alone to explain long-term patterns of prehistoric cultural and biological variation, can overlook the large-scale patterning visible on continental and millennial scales in the linguistic and archaeological records.

Reticulate processes of pattern-formation

In two recent papers, Moore (1994a; 1994b) has asked how 'ethnic groups' - the named ethno-linguistic entities studied by ethnographers have been generated throughout the human past and in the ethnographic record. Moore criticizes 'bifurcatory' (phylogenetic) models and promotes 'rhizotic' (reticulate) ones. Reticulate processes focus on a continuous and relatively uncoordinated shifting of linguistic, cultural and biological boundaries through assimilation, intermarriage, borrowing and diffusion. According to Moore, they represent the true foundations of ethnogenesis; so interaction and borrowing, rather than the transmission of inherited traits, have always been the main sources of human cultural and biological variation.

Reticulate models have a distinguished pedigree. As stated by Jean Hiernaux over 30 years ago, referring to biological populations (Hiernaux 1964: 42):

Even if we could reconstruct the intricate succession of mixtures that contributed to each living population, the final picture would look like a reticulum more than a tree, and a reticulum defies dichotomizing subdivision.

A similar model was adopted by Morton Fried (1975) for the genesis of pre-state societies. Today the concept, albeit in varying guises, is commonplace. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Phylogeny vs Reticulation in Prehistory


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.