Second Amendment - Western District of Texas Upholds Gun Regulation under Intermediate Scrutiny in Post-Heller Decision. - United States V. Bledsoe

Harvard Law Review, December 2008 | Go to article overview

Second Amendment - Western District of Texas Upholds Gun Regulation under Intermediate Scrutiny in Post-Heller Decision. - United States V. Bledsoe


Though the Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller (1) that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms, it left the breadth of that right indefinite. The majority expressly declined to instruct lower courts on whether strict or intermediate scrutiny was appropriate for evaluating Second Amendment restrictions. (2) Recently, in United States v. Bledsoe, (3) a federal district court held that it would continue to apply intermediate scrutiny to laws that merely regulated, rather than proscribed, gun possession. In support of its decision, the court cited language in Heller indicating that a wide range of gun regulations were presumptively lawful. (4) This application of Heller suggests a disconnect between the Supreme Court and the district courts that will apply the decision. Bledsoe relied on familiar standard-of-review analysis, disregarding indications in Heller that gun regulations are lawful when analogous historical restrictions can be found. Its faithfulness to Heller is dubious, but Bledsoe offers a means of determining the scope of the newly-recognized right that is both more practicable and more consistent than the approach suggested by the Supreme Court.

In 2006, Cantrell Bledsoe picked out a pistol at a gun show and, because she was under twenty-one and therefore barred from purchasing firearms from a federally-licensed dealer, gave Calvin Bouldin money to buy it for her. (5) When purchasing the pistol, Bouldin represented that he was the actual buyer, but gave the gun to Bledsoe even before he left the premises of the gun show. (6) The next year, an ATF investigation led agents to Bouldin, who in turn implicated Bledsoe. (7)

Federal prosecutors charged Bledsoe with conspiring to obtain a firearm by making a false statement during a gun purchase in violation of 18 U.S.C. [section][section] 371 and 922(a)(6). (8) She moved to dismiss the indictment, claiming, inter alia, that she could not be liable for purchasing the gun through Bouldin since the Second Amendment granted her an individual right to possess the firearm. (9) District Judge Xavier Rodriguez held that while the Fifth Circuit had recognized an individual right to keep and bear arms, (10) that recognition did not preclude "limited, narrowly tailored specific exceptions or restrictions for particular cases that are reasonable." (11) Accordingly, the court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, without prejudice to reargue "should Heller announce a new rule." (12)

That announcement came on June 26, 2008, when the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms irrespective of service in a militia. (13) Writing for the Court, Justice Scalia affirmed the D.C. Circuit's decision to strike down a near-prohibition on handgun possession in the District of Columbia. (14) The decision employed extensive historical analysis of the circumstances in which the Second Amendment was drafted and the way it was interpreted soon after adoption. (15) The Court also repeatedly asserted that the right protected by the Second Amendment "is not unlimited," given the amendment's post-ratification history. (16) Though it declined to "undertake an exhaustive historical analysis ... of the full scope of the Second Amendment," it nonetheless asserted that the decision should not cast doubt on a raft of "longstanding" gun restrictions. (17) The Court similarly defended prohibitions on concealed weapons by arguing that "the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question" held that such bans were lawful. (18)

The Court declined to establish a standard of review for evaluating gun regulations, reasoning that "there will be time enough to expound upon the historical justifications for the exceptions we have mentioned if and when those exceptions come before us." (19) However, it rejected rational basis scrutiny (20) and Justice Breyer's suggestion in his dissent of an "interest-balancing inquiry. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Second Amendment - Western District of Texas Upholds Gun Regulation under Intermediate Scrutiny in Post-Heller Decision. - United States V. Bledsoe
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.