Why Is Religious Humanism?

By Flynn, Thomas W. | Free Inquiry, Fall 1996 | Go to article overview

Why Is Religious Humanism?


Flynn, Thomas W., Free Inquiry


Some years ago Paul Kurtz made the mistake of offering decaffeinated coffee to a roomful of humanist visitors from Europe. Few Europeans share the American passion for denatured food-stuffs; "Paul!" chided one Scandinavian. "Decaffeinated coffee? That's like religious humanism." As a secular humanist I am sometimes tempted to view religious humanism that way, as little more (or less) than an oxymoron. Mason Olds reminds us that this is a temptation worth resisting.

On first reading his "What Is Religious Humanism?" I was surprised how often Olds and I agreed. His comments on the reality of the natural world, the vacuity of religious paradigms, and humans' responsibility for their own welfare in an uncaring universe are as lucid and powerful as anything I have read on these topics. I would be proud to hand those passages to any inquirer as succinct expressions of the secular humanist outlook. I finished his essay wondering, "With all his monism, naturalism, materialism, and nontheism, what is there about Olds's life stance that in any meaningful way merits the label 'religious'?"

Yet the difference between religious and secular humanism is genuine and substantial. I have argued elsewhere that we should openly acknowledge the gap as a dividing line between two already-distinct and more or less immiscible species of thought.(*) A careful reading of Olds's essay helps show some of the reasons why.

Not surprisingly, religious humanism over-emphasizes the connection between the humanist movement and liberal Christianity. In his "first stanza," Olds presents an idiosyncratic history in which humanism unfolds entirely within the churches. That's hardly fair to the thinkers who comprise humanism's equally vivid freethought heritage: the philosophes, Paine, Ingersoll, Bennett, Bradlaugh, the early Annie Besant, J. M. Robertson, Joseph McCabe, and many others. A thorough historical treatment of humanism must encompass both the religious liberal and freethought strands of its development, along with the way they have converged in the United States, Britain, India, and elsewhere in the years since World War II.

Moreover, there is ample evidence that mixing humanism and religion benefits neither humanism nor religion. Certainly humanism has not been healthy for religion: the liberal Christian churches that most thoroughly humanized their doctrines are now in sharp decline. Believers flock to more demanding conservative and fundamentalist denominations, seemingly because those groups make fewer compromises with the world. Apparently opening up to the humanist worldview forces religions to give up elements so essential to their functioning that they no longer work as religions - at least, not for long.

Such accommodation has also borne bitter fruit for humanism. When Olds calls for poets and artists to craft "a new religion for the living of these days," when he casually announces that the universe is eternal (how does he know?), when he joins Max Otto in valuing "the life of the spirit," and, most important, when he denigrates the power and scope of scientific inquiry, his essay reflects the thread of obscurantism that has always dogged religious humanism. The religious humanist heritage includes the muddleheadedness of Emerson and James. It includes John Dewey's unfortunate waffling about the words religion and religious, of which more later. Most seriously, religious humanism includes all too much of the trendy relativism Olds indulges when he denies the possibility of "a privileged position from which a human being can determine which construct is correct . . . a metanarrative by which to determine the validity of one narrative over another." At best, such postmodern intemperances muddy thinking; at worst, they pave the way for humanism to be hijacked by mystics, anti-intellectuals, and opponents of science.

That Ol' Devil Semantics

When religious and secular humanists clash, semantics is often the bog in which discussion founders. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why Is Religious Humanism?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.