From Po-Mo to So-So

By Meades, Jonathan | New Statesman (1996), December 20, 1996 | Go to article overview

From Po-Mo to So-So


Meades, Jonathan, New Statesman (1996)


Postmodernism first meant knowing architectural jokes; two decades later it just means jokes

In the putative Taxonomy of Taxonomies, the essay on postmodernism will trace this compound's shift over half a century. The OED's earliest citation is J Hudnut's usage in Architecture and the Spirit of Man, from 1949. Things hotted up in the fifties; there were two sightings, but I suspect that neither Arnold Toynbee nor the sociologist C Wright Mills will be claimed as precursors by today's toilers in the labelling industry. They were thinking in centuries, not in terms of playful pediments or narrative ellipses.

Arithmetical progression demands three examples from the sixties, and that's precisely what the lex-wallahs provide. Now, however, there is a spluttering flame. Leslie Fiedler and Frank Kermode use it to describe the new literature of that decade - specifically, no doubt, the work of Thomas Pynchon, John Barth and, maybe, John Hawkes. And Nicholas Pevsner regards Churchill College, Cambridge (or, more likely, its plans), as postmodern. Today that building is more probably regarded as late modern.

The chronal vantage point is vital. We can perceive a continuum where the contemporary scrutineer could not - all Pevsner saw was a centrifugal weakening of the international modern ideal of the twenties and thirties, an ideal whose most dogged proselytiser he was. He believed in progressive architecture but not in architectural progress. Once architecture had progressed beyond the institutionalised idiom of orthogonal whiteness into brutalism and hyperbolic paraboloids he became a sort of nostalgic.

Still, his presence in the OED is of moment, for more than anyone else in this century he sought to apply the taxonomical procedures of natural science (mycology, say, or lepidoptery) to the classification of buildings. There is some sense in this: architecture is more pervious to consensual norms than any other area of human endeavour - which is why it is much easier to date a building than a page of prose. And architecture (mostly) represents nothing: it is made from a kit of perhaps a couple of hundred gestures and is thus reducible to coded shorthand. The same goes for chefs, rock'n'rollers, clothes designers and cabinet makers. Craft is conditional upon repetition and is thus susceptible to handles being applied to it: nouvelle cuisine, neo-classicism with a Workers for Freedom twist, quilted Bauhaus. Art is not so susceptible. And it is demeaned by labels such as post-modern, labels such as . . . For the past 15 years there has been no label to match this one, and for the ten years previous to those it was around if you knew where to look.

I know precisely where to look. Twenty-five years ago, in the December 1971 issue of Books and Bookmen, in an essay on Borges, a child called Jonathan Meades noted that it is "difficult to find any major postmodernist writer who has not been compared with [sic] the Czech". The Czech is, evidently, Kafka. And the "major postmodernist" writers will have been Borges himself, Nabokov and Robbe-Grillet - supreme pattern-makers, inventors of devices, creators of autonomous and hallucinatorily precise worlds, fellow travellers of art for art's sake. Those were attributes that, I suppose, defined postmodernism in those days. These writers are inconceivable without the example of Kafka, of Joyce; yet, in the case of Borges and Nabokov, they are story-tellers, informed by an almost Edwardian limpidity. Borges is famously indebted to Chesterton and Stevenson; Nabokov owed much to the Wells of Mr Polly and Tono-Bungay.

They looked back, if you like, through modern eyes to premodernism. The appeal of these high artificers was partially occasioned by the sheer dullness of English writing at the time - with the exceptions of Burgess, Ballard, and B S Johnson it was unfailingly provincial, doggedly naturalistic, tiresomely prosaic; it wasn't so much post-modern as anti-modern, the fictive analogue of neo-Georgian buildings. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

From Po-Mo to So-So
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.