Cease-Fire Is the Only Option for Israel
Some geopolitical conflicts are morally complicated. The Israel-Gaza war is not. It possesses a moral clarity not only rare but excruciating.
Israel is so scrupulous about civilian life that, risking the element of surprise, it contacts enemy noncombatants in advance to warn of approaching danger. Hamas, which started this conflict with unrelenting rocket and mortar attacks on unarmed Israelis 6,464 launched from Gaza in three years deliberately places weapons in and near the homes of its own people.
This has two purposes. First, counting on the moral scrupulousness of Israel, Hamas figures civilian proximity might help protect at least part of its arsenal. Second, knowing that Israelis have new precision weapons that may allow them to attack nonetheless, Hamas hopes that inevitable collateral damage or, if it is really fortunate, an errant Israeli bomb will kill its own people for which, of course, the world will blame Israel.
For Hamas the only thing more prized than dead Jews are dead Palestinians. The religion of Jew-murder and self-martyrdom is ubiquitous. And deeply perverse, such as the Hamas TV childrens program in which an adorable live-action Palestinian Mickey Mouse is beaten to death by an Israeli (then replaced by his more militant cousin, Nahoul the Bee, who vows to continue on Mickeys path to martyrdom).
At war today in Gaza, one combatant is committed to causing the most civilian pain and suffering on both sides. The other is committed to saving as many lives as possible also on both sides. Its a recurring theme. Israel gave similar warnings before attacking Hezbollah in the Lebanon war of 2006. The Israelis did this knowing it would lose the element of surprise and cost the lives of their own soldiers.
That is the asymmetry of means between Hamas and Israel. But there is equal clarity regarding the asymmetry of ends. Israel has but a single objective in Gaza peace: the calm, open, normal relations it offered Gaza when it withdrew in 2005. …